Help support TMP


"Glendale & Malvern Hill Area Map - 1862" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board

Back to the ACW Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Thoroughbred USS Monitor

The G Dog Fezian couldn't say 'no' to this opportunity!


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


1,219 hits since 23 Sep 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP23 Sep 2015 7:28 a.m. PST

Howdy,

This draft map shows the area south of the "Gates of Richmond Map." It can be used for Peninsula actions following Gaines Mill.

It will be included in "A Storm in the Valley 1862" the forthcoming ACW scenario book for Volley & Bayonet.

One grid square is one foot on the table top, 1200 yards. The coordinates shown correspond to the "Gates of Richmond Map."

Ponder on,


JAS

general btsherman23 Sep 2015 9:03 a.m. PST

Nice

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP23 Sep 2015 9:52 a.m. PST

Howdy,

Thank you, one of my goals it to give gamers an alternative way of viewing the battles – a more operational view.

I think you can boil down the lessons of the peninsula in three bullets:

(1) Converging columns don't.

(2) Frontal assaults are costly.

(3) Higher commanders need to be present to promptly react to changing circumstances.

Ponder on,


JAS

KTravlos23 Sep 2015 10:58 a.m. PST

Indeed very nice!

Personal logo McLaddie Supporting Member of TMP23 Sep 2015 9:18 p.m. PST

Nice. You got rid of the red-dotted major roads. Much cleaner and easier to read with all the black building squares.

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP24 Sep 2015 5:08 a.m. PST

Howdy,

Yes, I agree, but no more mile markers. The red dots were generally about a mile apart on the major roads. They did serve a purpose.

JAS

vtsaogames26 Sep 2015 11:29 a.m. PST

Looking good.

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP12 Oct 2015 11:31 a.m. PST

Howdy,

Shown below is the draft, first cut, at the Scenario No. 9 map. Terrain derived from the area map shown above.

Ponder on,


JAS

Darkoath16 Nov 2015 7:35 a.m. PST

The only thing I would change for the Scenario 9 map above is making lettering for your labels right side up. So I would for example, turn Malvern Hill 90 degrees. And make sure the creek and road labels are right side up. Your maps look really good! When is this scenario book due out?

Ponder Supporting Member of TMP16 Nov 2015 8:15 a.m. PST

Howdy,

Imagine the "left side" is the bottom. Think about the dimensions of a page.

I aim to finish the scenario writing by January, and get to layout by June 2016, with the goal of getting it out in Fall 2016. I note I have not coordinated this with Glenn at ToB; he might possibly prefer waiting to Historicon 2017. We'll see, but progress is being made.

We just wrapped up the playtest of the Shenandoah Mini-Campaign. A Union victory.

Ponder on,


JAS

Darkoath17 Nov 2015 6:57 a.m. PST

Oh sorry JAS that makes much more sense now… nice maps!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.