Help support TMP


"Tacna 1880 BBB with pix" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Battle Reports Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

They Died For Glory


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Turkish Keyk-Class Patrol Digs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally dips his toe into the world of Aeronef.


1,511 hits since 11 Sep 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

vtsaogames11 Sep 2015 11:01 a.m. PST

Thursday evening the Corlears Hook Fencibles played a game of the 1880 battle of Tacna, with Chile against Peru and Bolivia. Rick played the Chileans and I the Allies. Warning: we did not have any of the correct figures. 1870 French provided the Chileans (and the sole Allied Gatling battery), 1866 Austrians stood in for Bolivians and our most ragged Confederates served as Peruvians. Mitrailleuses stood in for Gatling guns. If you haven't been deeply offended yet, read on.

I began by making an egregious error. The scenario states that aside from the artillery redoubts, the Allies may deploy anywhere on their ridge. I deployed them as marked on the map. This left most of my infantry on the forward slope and my left flank in air. This would not end well.

picture

The Chileans marched on from the western edge and began forming a grand battery astride the only road. This put them within 18" of the forward rifle pits and artillery redoubts, easy artillery range yet beyond rifle range.
picture

The Chilean Gatling battery was limbered, a tempting target. I fired and silenced it on my defensive fire phase and then hit them hard on my next fire phase, going low on ammo. I should have been firing at the enemy artillery, which began hitting my infantry.
picture

The Chileans massed against my left. I began shifting units on bolster my left.
picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

As the line frayed, the left flank CO Colonel Camacho had to jump into a ditch, twice as it turned out. Since there was no road nearby, the appearance of the ditch was deemed a miracle.
picture

picture

picture

picture

Looks bad, eh? Let's shift to the right flank earlier in the game.

picture

Later the right flank artillery put paid to the Chilean cavalry.

picture

And then the Chilean grand battery started to get the range.

picture

They began to combine artillery barrages with infantry fire. Overhead fire is allowed if the intervening friends aren't too close to firer or target. The front slope of the ridge was a shooting gallery. Cover from the rifle pits didn't do enough to counteract this.
picture

picture

A new line was cobbled together as it became obvious something was wrong with the left flank.
picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

picture

This reminds me of Leonidas' last charge in the old 300 Spartans (not the recent movie with the leather panties).
picture

The Chileans had 2 of the three redoubts they needed for victory. One infantry unit was on the verge of taking the one on my right but a fresh Bolivian unit intervened.
picture

We headed into the last turn. I told Rick only one thing counted. He had one unit that could march into my right center redoubt, which had been cleared by his artillery. He rolled a full move and the fresh unit took the redoubt. The only unit I had that might be able to counterattack was spent, disrupted and down to 2 stands. I threw in the towel. Had we played the rest of the turn there would likely have been some more Allied casualties.
picture

We played this one fairly slowly, 3 hours and 40 minutes. That's about 27 minutes a turn. The game was fun, despite the whipping I took. Allied losses were about 6,500 and most of the artillery, while the Chileans lost 2,500 troops and had severe losses in the Gatling battery, which never got into range.

Rick crowed about owning all of the guano. We made numerous jokes about the miraculous survival of Colonel Camacho. Colonel Pinto had to duck into nearby rifle pits towards the end. It was bad day for dress uniforms.

One mistake made was the scenario rules call for a one column shift left for all artillery due to the soft sand of the Atacama muffling shells. I remembered just before we broke for dinner and forgot by the time we returned. The other mistake about the deployment, well all I can say is I was finishing the bases on my 1866 Austrian jaegers before the game and we played two games of W1815. I'm not so great at multi-tasking. That's my story and I'm sticking to it. There won't be any more Fencibles games this month. We'll have something to report in October, if we keep our powder dry.

Costanzo111 Sep 2015 1:38 p.m. PST

Beautiful!

mghFond11 Sep 2015 8:05 p.m. PST

Thanks for doing all these battle reports, I love reading them. You've influenced me to start up painting figs for the RussoTurkish War of 1877 and use BBB as the rules system.

mashrewba12 Sep 2015 4:55 a.m. PST

A load of Austrian, French and ACW types -that's what I'll be doing as well!!
And as for these chaps…

picture

vtsaogames12 Sep 2015 6:58 a.m. PST

Thank you, gents. Glad you weren't put off by the use of other troops.

KTravlos12 Sep 2015 10:18 a.m. PST

Excellent. The Chilean player truly lived up to the country motto "Con Rason o Fuerza" (by reason or force).

vtsaogames12 Sep 2015 7:21 p.m. PST

Question: previously I report turn by turn or close to it. This time I went by sector more or less. Which do you prefer?

Fencible Bill said I should have at least one picture of the whole field.

ChrisBBB13 Sep 2015 8:35 a.m. PST

Bill beat me to it – I was also going to suggest include a panorama of the whole battlefield.

The sector-by-sector approach worked nicely for this one. It does have the advantage that we readers don't have to reorient ourselves for every picture.

Chris

vtsaogames13 Sep 2015 10:19 a.m. PST

OK, but it is more work. I do agree about the whole table shot, maybe one before and the same after marked with arrows showing who went where.

KTravlos13 Sep 2015 10:20 a.m. PST

Sector to Sector is not a bad idea.

vtsaogames13 Sep 2015 12:32 p.m. PST

Rick has agreed to play this again in October. That's another play test for the scenario and I don't have to put the stuff away. Curiosity combined with laziness is hard to beat.

ChrisBBB13 Sep 2015 12:43 p.m. PST

Cool. And that gives you a couple of weeks to paint up those Bolivian Presidential Guards!

Chris

vtsaogames14 Sep 2015 5:53 a.m. PST

Umm, I don't think so. I may have the additional 60 1866 Austrian infantry done by then. I've got 8 artillery units being based now.

mashrewba15 Sep 2015 9:32 a.m. PST

I've got all sorts of 19th cent 28mm stuff of which the Mexican and French stuff is probably closest but I will have to do some units for this -especially some of the colourful Bolivians and maybe mix in some Confederates painted as Triple Alliance Brazilian militia -they can't touch you for it you know!!!
I'll use Black Powder or Field of Battle but I will be getting hold of BBB.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.