"The Bloodiest Day of the Third Crusade – Richard I and ..." Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Media Message Board
Areas of InterestMedieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench ArticleDon't let the horses daunt you!
Featured Profile ArticleThe gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 08 Sep 2015 3:16 p.m. PST |
…Saladin at the Battle of Arsuf. "King Richard I and his allies successfully secured the city of Acre in July 1191, and the second phase of the campaign to free Jerusalem from Saladin's forces began. For years, scholars have debated whether Richard and his crusader army could have taken and held Jerusalem, which had been captured by their enemies in October 1187. One issue most Western scholars agree on was the need for Christian control of towns along the coastline south of Acre to Jaffa and the need for a secure supply route from Jaffa to Jerusalem—over 30 miles—to replenish the army for what was expected to be a drawn-out siege. On the 22nd day of August, the Lionheart's army marched from Acre. Estimated to be 15,000-20,000 strong, the troops advanced slowly at first, 2 or 3 miles a day. Marches began well before sunrise. As the men became acclimatized to the heat, they covered 10-13 miles a day, usually halting by midday and often resting a day. Between August 25 – August 30, 36 miles were covered. By September 5th, they'd advanced another 23 miles of the 80 mile trek between Acre and Jaffa…" Full text here link Amicalement Armand |
Tango01 | 09 Sep 2015 10:56 a.m. PST |
Anyone have wargame this? Amicalement Armand |
janner | 09 Sep 2015 11:46 p.m. PST |
It's a pretty dated version of the events leading up to the battle, as well as the battle itself, but interesting nethertheless. |
Gunfreak | 10 Sep 2015 12:39 p.m. PST |
It's a pretty dated version of the events leading up to the battle, as well as the battle itself, but interesting nethertheless. Any detailed books on the battle. My Runciman covers the battle in about one paragraph…. |
janner | 10 Sep 2015 10:21 p.m. PST |
Although I disagree on his opinions on Richard's willingness to fight and his repetition of the usual loss of Hospitaller control chestnut, Tom Asbridge covers it in some depth in The Crusades – The War for the Holy Land. |
Tango01 | 10 Sep 2015 11:29 p.m. PST |
Glad you found it interesting my friend. Amicalement Armand |
|