Help support TMP


"'The Scandalous Lady W ' - BBC" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


1,202 hits since 27 Aug 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

42flanker27 Aug 2015 6:36 a.m. PST

If you live within range of our sceptered isles, and have time to squander

link

If not, scroll through this agonising 'behind-the-scenes' bit of 'puff'
link

(with the sound 'off,' I reccommend) to check out those Guards officers… well, I think they're Guards officers. I mean, who else would be sporting such fine whiskers, in 1781?

Winston Smith27 Aug 2015 6:51 a.m. PST

It has Lady Margaery Tyrell in it.
Does she keep her clothes on in this one?

Cerdic27 Aug 2015 8:48 a.m. PST

I've heard she doesn't….

42flanker27 Aug 2015 12:35 p.m. PST

As if…

David Manley27 Aug 2015 9:39 p.m. PST

I was mist impressed with her all to short appearance in Rush :)

Guy Barlow28 Aug 2015 3:22 a.m. PST

Saw it. I would give it a 7 out of 10. Most of that is for the costumes and the period houses they filmed it in. Actually she wasn't that bad. I think the fault was with the 2 lead male actors who were not that great and the faintly ridiculous feminist spin in the script which was laid on in unsubtle 2015 politically correct spades.

Supercilius Maximus28 Aug 2015 7:00 a.m. PST

The whiskers are a complete anachronism for that time – early 1800s and you'd be fine with them. The epaulettes are silver, do definitely not the Guards; and everyone seems to have TWO, so they are all senior officers, it seems, regardless of age.

Actually, uniform-wise, not a bad effort for a 1780-ish setting.

@ Guy Barlow – The Spectator agrees with your final sentence.

link

42flanker29 Aug 2015 10:47 p.m. PST

It's hard to see where the inspiration for the 'Burnside' whiskers came from. Clearly the production designer's research into facial hair (or lack of) did not extend to the archives of the Rev List forum. Endless hours of fun.

Side whiskers had begun to creep down by 1790 but apart from the grenadiers of the 36th at Bangalore circa 1791 there is no evidence of moustachios worn by the British infantry in Europe until quite some time after 1800- 5th Bn, 60th excepted, perhaps.

Yes, gold lace for the Guards, of course,- but a Royal regiment at the very least!- although it seems the design approach followed thematic theatrical standards rather than those of 'realistic' film making. I imagine they thought single epaulettes of company officers- where appropriate- would have looked odd to a modern audience. I know of portraits from the 1780s that had a second epaulette added in Victorian times for that reason. Ditto officers wearing different coloured facings.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.