Help support TMP


"Comms-Denied Environmnt" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Action Log

02 Feb 2016 1:56 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Christmas Stocking Stuffer for Armor Fans

These "puzzle tanks" are good quality for the cost.


Featured Profile Article

White Night #2: Save the Choppers

Can Harriers protect Sea Apaches and Seahawks from hostile Tornados and Mirage 2000s?


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,058 hits since 8 Aug 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian08 Aug 2015 8:53 p.m. PST

Captain Patrick Molenda, writing in Proceedings magazine, states that:

While significant advances across the electromagnetic spectrum have indeed transpired, so have the associated vulnerabilities… It's quite possible that the Navy could face an adversary [with] the ability to disrupt critical communications.

Would you like to see game designers provide more emphasis on fighting in a comms-denied environment?

Mute Bystander09 Aug 2015 2:54 a.m. PST

Not sure how that is possible with Modern Naval War Games…

Cold Steel09 Aug 2015 4:19 a.m. PST

Tactically, comms-denial is a lot harder to achieve than most people think. The initial surprise can give the other guy a couple of minutes of advantage, but it won't last long. With our fast frequency-hopping communications and guidance systems, an enemy jammer must blanket broad spectrums of wavelength, denying those wavelengths to themselves as well. They have to broadcast a signal that is more powerful at the receiver location tan the transmitter you are trying to disrupt. All that makes a jammer very easy to find and target.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP09 Aug 2015 7:34 a.m. PST

You mean like this one?

picture

smells like victory

picture

I do a lot of comms denied environment games. As Mute Bystander points out, it is difficult to do in a traditional tabletop game where each player can just see and otherwise know a lot of the info that good C2 provides.

Mako1110 Aug 2015 2:09 a.m. PST

IIRC, morse code can be pretty hard to jam as well.

Lion in the Stars10 Aug 2015 8:10 a.m. PST

Morse is actually really easy to pick out of background noise, and highly resistant to jamming if the receiver's ear training is good. My stepdad is a ham radio operator, and only does CW comms for his contests. He can pick a single signal out of what sounds like a pure-static signal to me that is several thousand people all trying to talk to one person at the same time.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP10 Aug 2015 5:49 p.m. PST

Being well suited for steganography and many transmission media isn't the same thing as being resilient to jamming. It makes the message somewhat resilient to degradation by having a higher acceptable signal to noise ratio. All that means is you have to create more noise, which is not particularly taxing. When you move to signal denial, it is lost like anything else.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.