Help support TMP


"The U.S. Navy's Newest Amphibious Assault Ships..." Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Action Log

28 Aug 2015 8:01 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2005) board

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

MEA Infantry Squad [BEvo]

The Editor snaps some photos of the pre-painted Middle Eastern infantry from Mongoose's new game, Battlefield Evolution.


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Paint My Mini?

Could artificial intelligence take a photo of an unpainted figure and produce a 'painted' result?


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


Current Poll


1,241 hits since 30 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0130 Jul 2015 4:04 p.m. PST

… Are The Size Of Other Countries' Aircraft Carriers.

"The America-class will be the size of other countries' aircraft carriers.

Over at military.com, Kris Osborne reports that the assembly of the second America-class amphibious assault ship, USS Tripoli, is going according to plan, with a third of initial construction already complete.

The ship "is approximately 30% complete. Fabrication has started on 211 units, 97% of all units, and 84 grand blocks are erected — 47% of the total," according to a U.S. Navy spokesperson who provided Osborne with a written statement.

Scheduled for launch in in July 2017 and with a tentative induction date set for December 18, the ship is specifically designed to accommodate Marine Corps F-35B Joint Strike Fighters, along a host of other aircraft such as MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft, CH-53 Super Stallions, and UH-1Y Huey helicopters…"
Full article here
link

picture

Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars30 Jul 2015 6:01 p.m. PST

Yes, but most other countries' carriers have either catapults or a ski-jump ramp, plus an angled flight deck.

Noble71330 Jul 2015 11:25 p.m. PST

Tango you gotta keep what news articles you post better organized :D ( TMP link )

Lion you make a good point about the flight decks. I wonder what sortie rates these LHAs can actually support. Been a couple years since I've had eyes on an a real OPLAN for an amphibious assault so I don't recall those sorts of planning considerations.

PHGamer31 Jul 2015 6:59 a.m. PST

Speaking from ignorance here, but since most of the aircraft are VTOL, doesn't the primary consideration for sortie rate depend on flight deck crew numbers and training? I am not sure what the catapult has to do with it. If anything I think that would slow down the sortie rate. But as I said, I am no authority and am eager to hear more.

Bangorstu31 Jul 2015 7:43 a.m. PST

Ski-ramp means your VTOL planes can carry a heavier payload.

freerangeegg31 Jul 2015 8:22 a.m. PST

Is that article right?
The US are building 211 of them?

GarrisonMiniatures31 Jul 2015 10:26 a.m. PST

'The ship "is approximately 30% complete. Fabrication has started on 211 units, 97% of all units, and 84 grand blocks are erected — 47% of the total,"

My reading of the about that the ship is being built in prefabricated units, 211 of those units have been started.

tulsatime31 Jul 2015 10:38 a.m. PST

There are 211 units that are built and then joined together to form the entire ship.

Noble71331 Jul 2015 3:57 p.m. PST

doesn't the primary consideration for sortie rate depend on flight deck crew numbers and training?

That's a big part but is somewhat platform-independent. From an engineering perspective, the big issues are the design/layout/and total floorspace available of the hangar decks. You need to be able to recover aircraft, get them below deck quickly via elevator, rearm-them (which means the methods of moving munitions from armored storage up to the hangar needs to be safe AND efficient), and move them to another elevator to put them on the flight deck again.

Carriers built by less experienced powers, particularly the Soviet/Russian Kiev and Kuznetsov classes, punt this sort of workflow optimization into the stands. Since the LHA6 is based on a design meant for well deck operations, we can only guess at how much stuff they moved around to get the hangar spaces up to CVN levels of efficiency.

Tango0101 Aug 2015 11:23 a.m. PST

Seems that the article is right.

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.