Help support TMP


"I'll bet it fooled the enemy MI for 5 whole minutes" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

BrikWars


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Elmer's Xtreme School Glue Stick

Is there finally a gluestick worth buying for paper modelers?


Featured Workbench Article

3Dprinting Recessed Bases

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian experiments with using recessed bases for figures with cast-on bases.


1,186 hits since 29 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Korvessa29 Jul 2015 9:43 p.m. PST

So, I am reading a book on Pegasus Bridge. It mentioned the British named their second (as in created second, not numbered second) airborne division the 6th, in order to fool the Germans on how many airborne divisions they had. Really? That can't have worked more than like five minutes.

I have read this sort of thing about other countries as well.

skippy000129 Jul 2015 9:52 p.m. PST

It is done to confuse movements.

Jemima Fawr29 Jul 2015 10:24 p.m. PST

While I don't have any specific references to the examples you mention, there are numerous examples of the Germans being fooled by that sort of Allied counter-intelligence effort and they frequently listed whole divisions, corps, armies and even army groups that didn't exist. The 'First US Army Group' being the most famous example.

At a smaller scale, 151 Para, which was raised in India, was renumbered 156 Para when it was moved to the UK, in an effort to conceal the movement from Japanese intelligence.

advocate30 Jul 2015 1:49 a.m. PST

While I don't have any specific references to the examples you mention, there are numerous examples of the Germans being fooled by that sort of Allied counter-intelligence effort and they frequently listed whole divisions, corps, armies and even army groups that didn't exist. The 'First US Army Group' being the most famous example.

Of course, later in the war the Germans also listed many of their own divisions, corps and armies that no longer existed…
I don't know about the Allies, but I think the Germans changed their divisional signs several times during the war for purposes of security. These kind of things may not work for long, but they might give you a slight edge for a short time.

Thomas Nissvik30 Jul 2015 2:20 a.m. PST

It is part of the game. The Finns did a complete rename during the Winter War and that only lasted 3 months!

Dynaman878930 Jul 2015 4:57 a.m. PST

How long did the German high command think Normandy was a "Diversion"? This kind of thing happens in business too, you NEVER give your first company ID 1 (and least you don't tell them if you do!)

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP30 Jul 2015 5:33 a.m. PST

Military intelligence is a tricky thing – in the winter of 1941 the Germans were being attacked by Russian divisions they didn't know existed, so I imagine this sort of thing might be more effective than one might think

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP30 Jul 2015 5:58 a.m. PST

On a smaller scale – the few Westland Whirlwinds manufactured kept being assigned to new squadrons in order to give the impression that there were far more of them then was the case.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP30 Jul 2015 7:48 a.m. PST

How long did the German high command think Normandy was a "Diversion"?

Don't know if you meant this as a rhetorical question or not, but the German High Command (OKW) thought it was a diversion until the Allies broke out of the bridgehead, destroyed the German armies, and went racing across France. The massive Allied deception effort kept the OKW fooled until it was entirely too late for them to do anything about it.

Jim

GarrisonMiniatures30 Jul 2015 8:30 a.m. PST

I gather that the SAS got their name because the British had a number od paper units designed to fool the Germans. With the SAS, they simply activated one of them.

Weasel30 Jul 2015 11:10 a.m. PST

I suppose it's one of those things that require relatively little effort to do, so it's worth doing even if there's only a 10% chance of fooling the enemy, since the payoff can be out of proportion to the effort spent.

And well, if you can confuse your own officers, what chance does the enemy have? :-)

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP30 Jul 2015 11:20 a.m. PST

Or how about that whole german army group that drowned. after the allies said the english channel dried up after a very hot summer.

hocklermp530 Jul 2015 3:11 p.m. PST

When the Chinese began to intervene in Korea prisoners would say they were from the "62nd Volunteer Unit" and the unit was a few hundred men strong. Other prisoners gave differing information that UN HQ Intel types were totally confused as to the strength of the Chinese forces coming into the country. There is speculation that some of these "POWs" were plants for the very purpose of confusing UN forces. By the time they found out that the various unit numbers were entire divisions or armies the Chinese offensive began with 250,000 troops infiltrated into North Korea. An outstanding deception plan backed up with an even more outstanding infiltration of masses of infantry.

Great War Ace30 Jul 2015 4:43 p.m. PST

Ferrari numbered the 39 chassis (the only ones that ever existed) of the 250 GTO in such a fashion as to give the impression that there were the required number of manufactured cars. (I don't know how many that was, but the 250 GTO never came close to numbering what was required by the "rules".) Evidently this was not discovered until some years after it was too late. If it works in peacetime, I'm sure it has worked in wartime. (Btw, each of those cars now sells for millions in the teens at the very least, all the way up to well over $50 USD million….)

Timbo W30 Jul 2015 5:54 p.m. PST

It's amazing what one can figure out if the enemy labels their stuff logically link . Though on the other hand I did hear tnat the US army HQs in ww2 Europe had to be assigned british military 'interpreters' to explain what the uk and commonwealth allied unit nomenclature actually meant.

Whatisitgood4atwork31 Jul 2015 1:57 a.m. PST

Back when I was freelancing, I numbered my first client invoice as 'Invoice number 51', and went on from there.

I didn't want my few clients to know how few of them I had, or that I hadn't ever done this before.

christot03 Aug 2015 7:20 a.m. PST

The Germans continually overestimated allied divisional numbers throughout the NWE campaign..including airborne divisions (iirc they thought there were 8 allied airborne divs) -their intelligence simply wasn't very good. Exactly why this was I'm not entirely sure, the fact that allied divisions were generally much larger might have something to do with it, plus there being far more ghq units in allied armies, lack of decent air recce, not having any spy network worth talking about plus a almost universally hostile population = poor intel

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.