Help support TMP


"General Bonaparte meets Chain of Command: Maida" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Product Reviews Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Land of the Free: Elemental Analysis

Taking a look at elements in Land of the Free.


1,377 hits since 28 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

John de Terre Neuve28 Jul 2015 4:27 p.m. PST

Further playtesting of this ruleset can be found here link

I have played several Napoleonic rule sets now and I can say this one is emerging as a real winner.

John

vtsaogames28 Jul 2015 8:30 p.m. PST

Mmm, please keep us posted about this.

daler240D29 Jul 2015 3:51 a.m. PST

I remember your write up on Lasalle awhile back. Any comment on comparisons of the two since they both are lower tactical level rules?

45thdiv29 Jul 2015 9:23 a.m. PST

I too would like to know more.

John de Terre Neuve29 Jul 2015 11:46 a.m. PST

I remember your write up on Lasalle awhile back. Any comment on comparisons of the two since they both are lower tactical level rules?

I have done write-ups on Lasalle, BP, FOG Napoleonic, Rank and File and Republic to Empire, all different. Of all the games I played I sort of liked Rank and File but there were some weaknesses in the Skirmish function and my fellow players just did not seem to like them.

I like Lasalle, it is certainly one of the best written rule books out there and has very nice and simple mechanisms, but I found the command function a little weak and it is basically you move all your troops and I move all my troops. There is very little fog there, there is decision making but it is not on the fly.

With GBCoC, you really have to make significant decisions each turn as your ability to do things varies with the command dice that are thrown. Movement is also variable so you may not make your charge that turn leaving yourself open to an easy countercharge the next turn.

I find the game a lot of fun and very simple to play.

John

vtsaogames29 Jul 2015 1:51 p.m. PST

I find the game a lot of fun and very simple to play.

Strong praise indeed.

Sam Mustafa is the best writer of our current game designers. His rule books read like prose. Whereas Barker can design a good game but oh, that writing…

Timmo uk29 Jul 2015 2:06 p.m. PST

Interesting – I look forward to reading more.

nsolomon9929 Jul 2015 3:44 p.m. PST

As a definite fan of Darren Green's LFS III Rules set I am eagerly awaiting these rules. The Lardies definitely have a bold and interesting way of approaching their rules sets.

Well developed Command & Control mechanisms are crucial to me in a napoleonic rules set. Which is the key reason I'm not at all interested in LaSalle – Sam was trying to achieve a different objective, which seems to have been achieved, but they don't interest me.

This use of the innovations out of Chain of Command has great potential.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.