"America's Crazy Attempts to Build Nuclear-Powered Aircraft" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleNeed some armored artillery vehicles?
Featured Workbench Articlecombatpainter has been watching some documentaries lately set in the Western Desert, and was inspired to create this...
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 17 Jul 2015 2:54 p.m. PST |
"Ah, the Atomic Age, when nuclear energy seemed the ticket to a future of limitless possibilities. For a generation after 1945 the United States explored all kinds of nuclear propulsion concepts. Some, like naval power plants for subs and ships, proved both revolutionary and effective. Others proved possible to develop but impractical to pursue. Of these concepts the nuclear-powered aircraft now seems the most fanciful, but billions of dollars and years of top-flight research sunk into the Aircraft Nuclear Propulsion (ANP) program chased the idea before its demise. Between the end of World War II and the dawn of Camelot American engineers figured out how to fit a reactor in an airplane and make it generate thrust without frying the crew. American leaders couldn't figure out how to pay for it or why they needed it. Today the ANP program is remembered as an Atomic Age boondoggle whose only remains consist of three-story-tall experimental units and giant hangars with six-foot-thick walls. When cancelled, the program was about to create flight-ready hardware and an airframe to put it in for a flight test program. However doubts about the future of manned bombers and concerns about accidents clouded a costly program ripe for cuts…" Full article here link Amicalement Armand |
Lion in the Stars | 17 Jul 2015 7:57 p.m. PST |
Not to mention the massively radioactive exhaust. Neat idea, and regularly abused in the Tom Swift novels, but runs afoul of radioactive contamination and a lack of understanding of long-term effects of exposure. |
skippy0001 | 17 Jul 2015 9:43 p.m. PST |
|
Mad Mecha Guy | 17 Jul 2015 11:58 p.m. PST |
The Russian were trying the same, but faked it, Russian did fit a reactor on a bomber, years later two of crew died leukaemia! The Americans looked at two different systems for engines: 1) Direct heating – radioactive elements in the engine directly heating the air, as you can guess very reactive exhaust 2) Indirect heating – heating fluid that then heats the air flowing thought engine, a lot less radioactive. With the modern knowledge of radiation shielding it would be possible to fit a Reactor on a plane responsibly safely. |
TKindred | 18 Jul 2015 3:19 a.m. PST |
The NB-36H. She carried a working nuclear reactor and an experimental power plant.
More here: 456fis.org/NB-36H.htm |
Blackhorse MP | 18 Jul 2015 1:56 p.m. PST |
With the modern knowledge of radiation shielding it would be possible to fit a Reactor on a plane responsibly safely. And when that plane is shot down or crashes? |
zippyfusenet | 18 Jul 2015 3:05 p.m. PST |
Heck, in the late forties we thought nuclear meant unlimited, free power with no drawbacks. We imagined that if you got blown up by a nuke, you'd get super-powers. We were trying to fit reactors to refrigerators, recliner chairs, tricycles, you name it. We learned better. |
Gwydion | 18 Jul 2015 3:21 p.m. PST |
|
zippyfusenet | 18 Jul 2015 3:38 p.m. PST |
Looks like one, Gwydion. Don't need headlights, 'cause the whole car glows so bright in the dark. The driver, too. |
Coelacanth1938 | 19 Jul 2015 11:09 a.m. PST |
|
|