Help support TMP


"Why The Next Cold War Will Be More Dangerous ..." Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board

Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

C-in-C's 1:285 Soviet BMP3

Time to upgrade your BMP1s and 2s?


Featured Profile Article

Dung Gate

For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


895 hits since 7 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0107 Jul 2015 11:38 p.m. PST

…Than The Last One.

"As the Minsk accord seems to collapse, new military dangers loom.

Nation contributing editor Stephen F. Cohen and John Batchelor continue their weekly discussion of the increasingly dangerous crisis in US/NATO-Russian relations. Cohen emphasizes that as the Minsk agreement to negotiate the Ukrainian civil and proxy war is being rejected by all participants (except Moscow), the New Cold War is rapidly being militarized and spreading to many countries in Eastern Europe. The result may be a confrontation more dangerous than the preceding 40-year Cold War, for several reasons: its epicenter is not in Berlin but on Russia's borders; unlike during that cold war, there are no shared rules of behavior or, as evidenced by the apparent collapse of the Minsk accord, ongoing diplomacy; and a new nuclear arms race is beginning without the traditional arms control process. Also discussed is whether the upcoming summit in Russia of Shanghai Cooperation and BRICS nations indicates that the Obama administration's policy of "isolating Putin's Russia" has failed and instead spurred a process toward a "multipolar" world order. Positions taken, or not taken, on the crisis by current candidates for the US presidency are also examined…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse09 Jul 2015 8:03 a.m. PST

More new deadly weapons would be my first thought …

cwlinsj09 Jul 2015 11:16 a.m. PST

I think it is still way too early for comparisons, especially since military expenditures are a fraction when compared to the height of the cold war. In addition, there are far fewer nukes in Europe than in the past. Also, the Warsaw Pact is gone and most of these countries are now actually members of NATO. Lastly, it really is a game of Russia vs everybody.

Remember that we (the West) won the first Cold War and we have far stronger financial capabilities than in past decades.

Mako1109 Jul 2015 11:16 a.m. PST

Perhaps, though it's really hard to beat the "good old days", when many more, shiny new, nuke weapons were pointed at one another, and ready to launch at the press of a button, while our opposing navies played bumper boats in the Med., and tag beneath the waves.

Now, I suspect, we'd have to wonder if many of the weapons would respond to launch commands, since they are so old and decrepit. Therefore, if it does go nuclear, perhaps humanity will only be destroyed three times over, instead of ten times, just to be sure.

Tango0109 Jul 2015 12:56 p.m. PST

Good points Mako11!.

Amicalement
Armadn

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.