Help support TMP


"Age of Sigmar Battle Report: Vampires vs. Wood Elves" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Warhammer Message Board


Areas of Interest

Fantasy

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

HeroQuest


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

15mm Orcs Riding Wyverns

Need something extra for your 15mm Orc hordes?


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


2,492 hits since 4 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

MongooseMatt04 Jul 2015 8:27 a.m. PST

Like many of you, we printed out the Warscroplls this morning, and had a bash this afternoon, Wood Elves vs. Vampire Counts.

You can see the results here;

link

Fishbuckle04 Jul 2015 8:30 a.m. PST

Sounds good. For me the points issue is neither here nor there, so this tempts me to give it a go with my Empire and Skaven troops.

MongooseMatt04 Jul 2015 8:51 a.m. PST

With free-to-download rules and stats, you really cannot go wrong…

Zargon04 Jul 2015 9:25 a.m. PST

So what GW are saying that they broke the rules in 8th that they are now giving the taster to 9th away free? Then comes the box set at $125 USD and then the add-ons and ad nausium before you know it your in for 1000s of $s and the rules are ampped till they broke again, this is when marketing at GW start rubbing their hands again, beware cheer full devils bearing gifts ;)
Cheers, nice stuff but feels like a deja vu cycle to me

Kenneth Portner04 Jul 2015 9:46 a.m. PST

Yes, but people will find a reason to complain anyway…….

Kenneth Portner04 Jul 2015 9:47 a.m. PST

With free-to-download rules and stats, you really cannot go wrong…

Yes, but people will find a reason to complain anyway…….

YogiBearMinis Supporting Member of TMP04 Jul 2015 9:57 a.m. PST

I wonder whether this game can slide in as a game of choice between low-model count skirmish and mass battles--it seems to have promise for that. That would be quite the coup for GW, and if they either create a true WFB 9th edition or an equivalent modification of AoS for BIG battles, then they might really come back against the inroads by some third party publishers.

nvdoyle04 Jul 2015 11:02 a.m. PST

If they make something like this for 40k, I just might come back into the fold.

Might.

Mithmee04 Jul 2015 8:43 p.m. PST

That is not AOS.

Looks more like WFB

JezEger05 Jul 2015 2:37 a.m. PST

"That is not AOS."
Well, as they were using the AoS rules, I kinda reckon it actually was AoS. Instead of constantly whining about GW why don't you actually say what you think is a good fantasy game. Most reviews of this look positive.
I'm sorry GW doesn't want you anymore. I feel for your loss. They took your money and betrayed you. After all that you did for them too. I had a similar experience when I was 14 and took a girl out for a pizza. Spent my money and she left me for another, broken hearted. All I can say is that time is a good healer. There will be another game. Chin up.

Regards05 Jul 2015 4:01 a.m. PST

The key is that you enjoyed yourselves. That is great to read and hope it continues!

Erik

Pictors Studio05 Jul 2015 6:14 a.m. PST

Sounds like it was a fun, balanced game, despite the lack of points. I certainly wouldn't have liked to face those undead with the constant summoning.

Thanks for posting the report. I enjoyed reading it.

(Leftee)05 Jul 2015 9:28 a.m. PST

Thanks, your battle report encouraged me to ignore the hand-wringing and actually print out the rules, scenery, orc and wood elf lists. I also realized, amazingly, I can try this game, try a different company, or even go back to the edition my son and I were playing prior to this – What a revelation.
Regarding points, on another post, having two sides with equal amount of wounds was suggested.

the trojan bunny05 Jul 2015 9:50 a.m. PST

Thanks for the bat rep. I am much more interested in seeing how AoS plays with the old armies than I am with the new models in the box set, so this was great.

If I ever get around to trying it, I'll probably go for more scenario/story driven games to get around the lack of points.

Mithmee05 Jul 2015 7:46 p.m. PST

Most reviews of this look positive.

Funny then we must be reading different reviews.

Pictors Studio05 Jul 2015 10:28 p.m. PST

"Regarding points, on another post, having two sides with equal amount of wounds was suggested."

There are formations or something in the back of each of the lists. It seems like in most cases the formations are roughly equal to each other.

Some are probably not so much, but the basic formation for each army seems to be about right.

Mithmee05 Jul 2015 10:59 p.m. PST

having two sides with equal amount of wounds was suggested

Defeats the purpose of the game.

Plus it would limit the use of my Ork & Goblin Army, which is well over 500 models.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.