Help support TMP


"Russian Pilot Shot Flares at Swedish Jet" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Tractics


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Hills for the Fulda Gap

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian decides on hills for his Team Yankee project.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Train Tracks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian checks out some 10/15mm railroad tracks for wargaming.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,420 hits since 1 Jul 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0101 Jul 2015 10:53 p.m. PST

"Sweden's top military commander says Russian fighter pilots are behaving in an increasingly aggressive manner in northern Europe, flying dangerously close to Swedish Air Force jets and in some cases even releasing flares at them.

Supreme Commander Sverker Goransson told a seminar on the Swedish island of Gotland on Monday that the Russians are breaking the normal rules of conduct for when military aircraft meet in the air.

He said examples include Russian planes breaking formation, flying at unsafe distances and using "countermeasures" that "nearly bounce off the metal" of the Swedish aircraft.

The Swedish military on Tuesday confirmed he was talking about decoy flares designed to divert incoming missiles…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1102 Jul 2015 7:43 a.m. PST

Game on!

My money's on the Swedish pilots.

tuscaloosa02 Jul 2015 8:49 a.m. PST

Where there is instability, Putin's Russia gains. Therefore, where things are stable, their goal is to create instability.

Now, I'm not quite up to speed on Baltic aviation. How do the Swedish front line fighter squadrons compare to Russia's naval aviation?

Bangorstu02 Jul 2015 8:54 a.m. PST

Swedes have 62 GripenCs in service with 50 earlier models in storage.

I'm going to guess the pilot quality is a lot better than the Russian average so they should be able to handle the threat.

Finns can add in another 54 F18Cs even before one looks at NATO.

Daniel S02 Jul 2015 9:45 a.m. PST

The actual number of aircraft is a bit of a complex issue, formaly the Swedish Airforce has 97 Gripens in it's inventory but only 72 of those are part of the war time organisation. In additon 67 older Gripens are mothballed while the remainder of the origanly 204 are mostly leased to other nations.

Pilot quality is not what it once was though the average is still probably better than that of the Russians. Budget restrictions and problems with recruitment has caused problems compared to the Cold War period when pilot quality was very high indeed.

Main problem is however not the quality of the pilots but the lack of ground crews and a shortage of missiles. Ground crew shortage may be so bad that only some 16-24 could be used sustained operations with peaks of some 30-40 aircraft if corners are cut/maxmimum effort made. It could be that the ground crew shortage could be made up by calling up former conscripts and people who have left the service but neither category will have fresh training and skills.

Missiles is a huge problem as Sweden only purchased 100 AMRAAMS and the replacement missilie (the Meteor) has yet to enter active service which causes significant problems at BVR range. Short range missilies is less of a problem with 400 IRIS-T in service and there might even be old Sidewinders sitting in storage.

Bases are another problem with several of the Baltic bases within S-400 or Iskander range even without adding the threat of air lainched weapons. The number of bases is also only a fraction of what was available during the Cold War period and the inovative network of road bases has been decomissioned. A surprise first strike could seriously damage the Swedish airforce as long as the current conditions are in place.

emckinney02 Jul 2015 10:16 a.m. PST

Time for the Swedes to start loading ball bearings in their decoy dispensers …

Tango0102 Jul 2015 10:23 a.m. PST

Agree!.

Amicalement
Armand

twawaddell02 Jul 2015 10:56 a.m. PST

"Brilliant" move by Russia. Putin doesn't want Sweden to join NATO so he craps all over them which can only encourage them to join NATO. I'm beginning to seriously wonder about the man's sanity!

jowady02 Jul 2015 12:12 p.m. PST

"Brilliant" move by Russia. Putin doesn't want Sweden to join NATO so he craps all over them which can only encourage them to join NATO. I'm beginning to seriously wonder about the man's sanity!

I agree, I don't see what he can gain by this other than to move Sweden closer to NATO. All that he can hope is that the Swedes are so frightened that they sign on with him but I really don't think this is the way to do that.

tuscaloosa02 Jul 2015 12:19 p.m. PST

True, but then he still controls the discussion, and while we're all discussing the very unlikely possibility of Sweden joining NATO, we're not discussing the Crimea or Eastern Ukraine.

Thanks for the input, Daniel. Very interesting.

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP02 Jul 2015 6:03 p.m. PST

Sometimes when people and nations are threatened, they get their back up and respond with strength. Sometimes they cave. I believe this is peace in our time.

Then the British and French went back to sleep. They did not hold exercises in Poland. They did not enter into negotiations with Sweden or other nations to form a solid wall against Germany.

Even if Sweden woke up tomorrow and said, we want to join NATO as soon as possible, how long would that take? Years?

Then you play with Russian invasion of Sweden with the wild card that NATO might intervene, if you roll three sixes on two D6. Not likely.

Mike Bunkermeister Creek
Bunker Talk blog

Bangorstu02 Jul 2015 11:12 p.m. PST

See some of us can tell that Russia will never ivnade Sweden in a month of Sudnays because it has precisely zero reason to do so.

Ascent03 Jul 2015 5:29 a.m. PST

Surprised we've not had someone on saying this is the sort of thing both sides do, that's what usually happens when we hear about an encounter with a Russian aircraft.

Jemima Fawr03 Jul 2015 6:22 a.m. PST

Ascent,

Funnily enough I was going to say that in the first post, but just thought I'd sit here and wait… It's what usually appears, but the posters then go strangely quiet when asked to provide examples… Perhaps they've got the message at last?

The Archer03 Jul 2015 9:53 a.m. PST

Daniel S-

The limited info I can find on the road bases shows some of them still in use for training or so this commentary says:

link

Daniel S03 Jul 2015 10:16 a.m. PST

Old article, a lot have changed in the 8 years since it was written and not for the better.

The runways still exist in some places but all the other supporting infrastructure such as fuel dumps, weapons bunkers, operations rooms and so on have been rendered unfit for operations or outright torn down. And the "Bas 90" battalions which serviced the road bases with ground crews and other staff no longer exist.

So could certainly be reactivated with enough money but that won't happen as none of the political parties are willing to spend the money needed to make the outdated and far too small "IO 2014" operational.

wardog05 Jul 2015 1:48 p.m. PST

mentioned above s300 and iskander, what kind of dedicated sead capability has Sweden got

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.