Help support TMP


"USA have claimed victory at the Battle of Waterloo" Topic


22 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Napoleonique/Encore


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Captain Boel Umfrage

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian returns to Flintloque to paint an Ogre.


Featured Profile Article

Herod's Gate

Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,658 hits since 24 Jun 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0124 Jun 2015 12:37 p.m. PST

WAF?? … (smile)

link

Amicalement
Armand

imdone24 Jun 2015 12:52 p.m. PST

A little WWII resentment sarcasm I imagine…maybe should stop showing up…

wingnut24 Jun 2015 1:05 p.m. PST

See if only. I wouldn't mind paying taxes if they were spent bombing other nations in imaginary conflicts we had no real stake in…..Wait a minute. ALRIGHT GO AIR-FORCE!

Brian Smaller24 Jun 2015 1:25 p.m. PST

Nice piece of satire.

vtsaogames24 Jun 2015 1:41 p.m. PST

Right, Zoltar, we should just not show up in the first place.

Personal logo McKinstry Supporting Member of TMP Fezian24 Jun 2015 2:21 p.m. PST

In 1815 wouldn't the US have been on the French side?

Bellbottom24 Jun 2015 2:57 p.m. PST

Stupid article, (little, or no, relevance to wargaming), similar response, all calculated to 'stir the pot' You find some good stuff Tango01, but you also find some dross, please be more selective.
regards P

Brian Smaller24 Jun 2015 3:03 p.m. PST

Good satire hits a nerve – I think it might have got you Jarrovian :)

As to no relevance to wargaming. Not so. I have played games where my American army has fought alongside the British against the French in a campaign game. Not a strong link I admit – but a link :)

PS – if I remember correctly my Armericans were supposed to come on the table in Turn 4 but showed up on Turn 7. I blamed the dice.

Mrkev50624 Jun 2015 3:04 p.m. PST

It's a fake news site, guys. Even says at the top that it's satire.

GarrisonMiniatures24 Jun 2015 3:04 p.m. PST

I think some people have no sense of humour.

Actually I believe there was an American on the British side at Waterloo. William Howe De Lancey. He died.

Bellbottom24 Jun 2015 3:31 p.m. PST

Not my nerve Brian, I'm a Brit, not a Yank. As to 'Good Satire' – doubtful, it's not exactly 'Private Eye'.
(If they wanted to be really wicked, they could have intimated our colonial cousins turned up late, then strafed the British troops – not uncommon, but I would never say that)

gamershs24 Jun 2015 3:48 p.m. PST

If jet fighters and drones had showed up at Waterloo then whoever side they were on won. Does this mean that Canada was conquered by the US in 1815?

Glengarry524 Jun 2015 4:56 p.m. PST

I thought it was funny! Actually, by the time of Waterloo the War of 1812 was over so the United States was not an issue (except for the Penisular veterans who were still overseas and thus unavailable for the British army at Waterloo).

Nick Bowler24 Jun 2015 6:31 p.m. PST

Dont be so sure that the US would have allied with France: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-War

Tankrider24 Jun 2015 7:01 p.m. PST

No need for the US to claim victory at Waterloo.. we'd already done our bit at New Orleans. :)

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP24 Jun 2015 8:33 p.m. PST

Quite amusing IMO.

Guthroth24 Jun 2015 11:13 p.m. PST

As a Private Eye subscriber, I thought it was an entertaining piece, but I wouldn't have posted the link here.

Some people are just too touchy ….. (See above)

Tango0124 Jun 2015 11:43 p.m. PST

"I think some people have no sense of humour."

Totally agree!.

Please! It's only for fun!.

This is not a Military School! (smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Supercilius Maximus25 Jun 2015 2:59 a.m. PST

To be fair, our colonial cousins were early for one "world war" having started the SYW two years before the rest of us.

That said, I would agree with those posters who suggest that the wit in this "satire" is more bludgeon than rapier.

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP25 Jun 2015 4:15 a.m. PST

If you want to be picky, I'd define the piece as parody rather than satire.

Thus it exaggerates, to the point of being ludicrous, a serious news story, though I think there are satiric elements.

Again, it amused me….but I should add I like slapstick & think (sadly) a pie in the face is a scream.


(and the surest way of making something not funny is to analyse it).

Murvihill25 Jun 2015 9:12 a.m. PST

'A spokesman for the US State Department was jubilant as he told the American people in a TV broadcast last night:…"Hell, we even won The Battle Of Britain for 'em. Anybody who's seen Ben Affleck kick Luftwaffe ass in Pearl Harbour knows that."'

I knew it was a fake as soon as I saw this guy mispronounce "Harbor".

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.