Silent Pool | 11 Jun 2015 10:12 a.m. PST |
…where us lady war gamers of the finer sort can go without having to put up with the usual male banter? (did I type Pink Fez? …oh yes. Thank goodness) |
BobGrognard | 11 Jun 2015 10:21 a.m. PST |
Wargaming banter is neither male nor female, it's for wargamers of any sex. Maybe we should attempt to avoid misogyny in any of our banter. |
napthyme | 11 Jun 2015 10:43 a.m. PST |
Not enough allowed here to bother really. |
Mute Bystander | 11 Jun 2015 10:49 a.m. PST |
Why? Did some female war gamer actually request it? I know a few female war gamers and a few more miniature painters who are female and they seem to be able to handle themselves in groups of males. |
John the OFM | 11 Jun 2015 10:53 a.m. PST |
|
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 11 Jun 2015 11:02 a.m. PST |
If we are going to segregate boards by gender, how about gender identity? Can we have a Trans wargaming board of some sort as well? |
Silent Pool | 11 Jun 2015 11:15 a.m. PST |
Yes. And no cheating. We will have to be firm on that. We might even have to shake. |
OSchmidt | 11 Jun 2015 11:33 a.m. PST |
Only if you promise and Bill enforces it that you post ONLY in your section and never post in the regular TMP. |
Robert Kennedy | 11 Jun 2015 12:48 p.m. PST |
|
RavenscraftCybernetics | 11 Jun 2015 12:49 p.m. PST |
more boards… lovely! this goes against my desire for a classless sexless raceless society. we are all just avatars here anyways. for years I had supermodel Kim Smith's photo on my member page and only a few took notice. why is this desirable? |
Winston Smith | 11 Jun 2015 12:52 p.m. PST |
Jeez, Otto. What are you gonna do when GURLZ climb the ladder up into your treehouse? Are you going to shout at them until they leave, like you did to that "lady" who messed up the display at the store? Are you still proud of that? |
Joes Shop | 11 Jun 2015 1:13 p.m. PST |
|
Weasel | 11 Jun 2015 1:44 p.m. PST |
I don't see a problem with adding more boards to the lounge and plus sections. My stance against boards is purely for the main sections. |
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 11 Jun 2015 2:50 p.m. PST |
I am normally in favor of more boards, as more biards generally yields in more confusion, and I like to add to the general confusion. However, in this particular case, I feel like the purpose of the newly suggested board is specifically to discriminate along gender lines, and that is a problem to me. I would no sooner want to see gender specific boards than religion specific boards or racial specific boards. |
DS6151 | 11 Jun 2015 3:22 p.m. PST |
Sure, why not? Apparently we have nothing but super specific nonsense boards anymore, so add another. Can't hurt. I vote yes. |
Doctor X | 11 Jun 2015 4:14 p.m. PST |
Yes. There is a definite shortage of boards. Everyone needs their own. |
Winston Smith | 11 Jun 2015 4:16 p.m. PST |
Maybe we can have "Boards for Broads". |
14Bore | 11 Jun 2015 4:58 p.m. PST |
I would hope at TMP boys and girls can share the same foxholes/ship bridges/command vehicles. |
Legion 4 | 11 Jun 2015 5:28 p.m. PST |
But isn't separate but equal … not … |
Editor in Chief Bill | 11 Jun 2015 5:30 p.m. PST |
Why? Did some female war gamer actually request it? Pink Dolores is identifying as female, see the original post. |
Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut | 11 Jun 2015 7:04 p.m. PST |
Thank you, Bill, for respecting how she identifies herself. My previous comments still stand. |
Grelber | 11 Jun 2015 7:05 p.m. PST |
Very Victorian. After dinner, we split up with the gentlemen going off for brandy and cigars and the ladies going off for . . . what did they go off for? Well, anyway, after the brandy, we rejoin the ladies. I've no idea what they'd talk about. Perhaps it would be like the two blogging gamer girls who regularly rated the restrooms at game stores. Grelber |
Robert Kennedy | 11 Jun 2015 7:10 p.m. PST |
Hey Bill? Are you going to make this a Poll? I think we all know how the votes on that would go LOL. Robert |
Cyrus the Great | 11 Jun 2015 7:16 p.m. PST |
I am normally in favor of more boards, as more biards generally yields in more confusion, and I like to add to the general confusion. @punkrabbitt returns, Please vote "yes" here. TMP link |
Editor in Chief Bill | 11 Jun 2015 8:59 p.m. PST |
Hey Bill? Are you going to make this a Poll? I'm not sure Pink Dolores AKA Blue Dalek isn't ing… |
Robert Kennedy | 11 Jun 2015 9:13 p.m. PST |
You may be right Bill. The account is under a new name I think. I forgot to wink LOL. And kyoteblue. Naw. I just don't think it would get more votes in the positive for it. IMO most here would not be in favor of it. I for one wouldn't.It would just be a waste to do it. Robert |
Silent Pool | 12 Jun 2015 3:16 a.m. PST |
This doesn't require a poll, it should be a gift from Editor Bill to encourage a minority group of wargamers. And then rightly seen as an encouragement to other minorities. Ladies will always lose out to male dominated voting systems unless the males feel disposed to accomodate ladies with whatever subject is in question. Unless on a possible TMP poll each female vote counts as 100:1 against the male TMP vote. And, trolling? NO. Compassionate? YES Name changing? Not against the TMP rules now is it? Just let me work myself out and I may revert. Bills Occasional Sock Puppet, call me whatever you want. Just call me. LOL |
Supercilius Maximus | 12 Jun 2015 9:42 a.m. PST |
Glass of wine or a fruit-based drink for the ladies – those are the rules. And if we didn't have rules, where would be be? That's right. France. |
etotheipi | 12 Jun 2015 12:02 p.m. PST |
Ladies will always lose out to male dominated voting systems unless the males feel disposed to accomodate ladies with whatever subject is in question. I think you grossly underestimate the ladies I game with, SWMBO and DOM, included. |
wrgmr1 | 12 Jun 2015 12:22 p.m. PST |
There are a number of ladies who have left TMP due to various reasons. Would these boards encourage them to come back? Maybe, but these boards would have to be somehow locked for female posters only. Pretty hard to do on a public forum. |
StarfuryXL5 | 12 Jun 2015 7:41 p.m. PST |
see … religion specific boards or racial specific boards. Hey, now there's an idea. After all, we have game-specific boards already. |
Flashman14 | 13 Jun 2015 2:55 a.m. PST |
No. And how will you avoid male banter? A Pink Fez with its own sign in maybe. But a board wouldn't satisfy your criteria for wanting one if it's just to keep men out. |
etotheipi | 13 Jun 2015 4:35 a.m. PST |
see … religion specific boards or racial specific boards. Hey, now there's an idea. After all, we have game-specific boards already.
Isn't a game-specific board the same thing as a religion-specific board? |
Mute Bystander | 13 Jun 2015 6:31 a.m. PST |
Pink Dolores is identifying as female, see the original post. I could identify as a female from the UK but… never mind… If that is granted then you need a "No Gurlz" part of the forum too. A great step backwards IMO. Actually TWO great steps backwards. There was a time I would have wanted a mixed race/mixed ethnic forum, (there were not many non-white war gamers in the 1950s/1960s FTR,) but I learned to deal with the (then) majority group in my home town and my hobby. Bill's forum. If he wants to put up a gender divided piece of the forum because of or against a poll result his call. I have made my position known as respectfully as possible. |
Mute Bystander | 13 Jun 2015 6:34 a.m. PST |
Isn't a game-specific board the same thing as a religion-specific board? No, that is scale-specific you are thinking of! |
Liliburlero | 13 Jun 2015 8:21 a.m. PST |
BobGrognard said: "Wargaming banter is neither male nor female, it's for wargamers of any sex. Maybe we should attempt to avoid misogyny in any of our banter." and John the OFM said: "No" We agree with both of them……. |
Weasel | 13 Jun 2015 10:35 a.m. PST |
Wouldn't it be easier to just rein in some of the "dudebro" banter? Or is that internet-Stalin or something? |
Mute Bystander | 13 Jun 2015 11:57 a.m. PST |
If it violates the rules, sure slam them. Been done (usually justifiably) to me on at least one forum. Truly racist/misogynist/etc., statements should be called out and let Bill decide if he acts. Weasel, What is your definition of "dudebro" banter – please be specific. |
Silent Pool | 13 Jun 2015 1:01 p.m. PST |
I feel deflated that no sisters have voiced their opinion, either way. The revolution is hereby cancelled. No refunds. |
Weasel | 13 Jun 2015 2:34 p.m. PST |
Mute – Some of the talk that pops up makes it seem like women are a mysterious, alien entity. It's kind of cringe-inducing. It's been a while though, so maybe everybody got over it or are just on their best behaviour now :) |
SJDonovan | 13 Jun 2015 3:34 p.m. PST |
|
Alfred Adler does the Hobby | 14 Jun 2015 1:54 a.m. PST |
Are we sure only females will post on it? Or will that not be the rule? |
Roderick Robertson | 14 Jun 2015 10:42 a.m. PST |
As far as dudebro banter, just take a look at Smokey… |
Silent Pool | 14 Jun 2015 2:23 p.m. PST |
WOW! That blonde chick is hot! (And yet she feels the cold). Bills Unconstitutional Sick Puppy don't call me. There's a new kid in town. The Dalek is landing. And this is Planet Earth. |
etotheipi | 15 Jun 2015 5:03 p.m. PST |
Didn't the Daleks get forcibly ejected from Earth like a bejillion times by some little nerd and his tool ..? |
DWilliams | 15 Jun 2015 6:57 p.m. PST |
I am all for a Ladies Lounge, but am still wondering who/what constitutes the "Pink Fez" crowd. Have I been missing out on all of the fun, or what? |