Help support TMP


"Size matters?" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Featured Book Review


1,108 hits since 15 May 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2015 4:38 a.m. PST

Just curious about this: in the TYW or ECW, how was a man chosen to be either a pikeman or an arqubusier/musketeer?

I would assume larger men might make better pikemen or was this not taken into account?

Oh Bugger15 May 2015 4:56 a.m. PST

Certainly that was the English practice sizewise it went pikeman, musketeer then arqubusier. Smaller lads lighter weapons.

I imagine it was similar elsewhere.

Griefbringer15 May 2015 6:55 a.m. PST

If I recall correctly, also in the Swedish army at the time the pikes were typically issued to the strongest men. Hopefully Daniel S. has more info on this.

Daniel S15 May 2015 1:09 p.m. PST

A very detailed pre-war instruction issued in the Habsburg lands does not at first glance mention size when selecting men for service but rather focuses on age.
Age 16 to 24 was suitable for calivermen
20 to 25 for musketeers
25 to 32 for pikemen
Those that were older up to about 45 years of age were to be armed with halberds.

The list of physical atributes desireable in a soldier does not mention size/height as such but was clearly aimed at getting men in good physical condition, there was a list of which type of men not enlist as well and the chapter finishes up ends with a series of sample questions that officers were to ask the would be recruit.

Pike service requires strenght and stamina and large size is not automaticly a sign of either. The constant shortage of pikemen is a clear sign that it was hard to find men who were willing and able wear the armour and carry the pike particulary if selected for experience and steadiness as well which the age requirement suggests.

Don Sebastian15 May 2015 5:53 p.m. PST

Daniel, your mention of the strenght and stamina necessary to be a pikeman got me wondering about how well distributed would a 16th/17th century pike's weight be. Diz they have some kind of counter-weight on the rear end, line the macedonian sarissas?

Daniel S16 May 2015 4:38 a.m. PST

No counterweight, it was all down to arm strenght. The tapered design did help with balancing the pike but unlike a sword it is not possible to create a "perfect" balance. And of course the early pikes were shorter than a sarissa and much easier to handle. (The 10 ft pikes used around 1500 are much handier than the later 16-18ft pikes.

Elenderil17 May 2015 1:57 p.m. PST

Even with badly balanced re-enactment pikes technique makes up for strength to a large degree. At the charge the butt of the pike is cupped in the palm of the right hand with the arm fully extended to the rear at shoulder height. The trick is to rotate the arm so the butt end of the pike is under the forearm. The left hand grips the pike level with the chin. The left acts as the fulcrum and the right guides the weapon.

This helps balance the pike and makes it easier to fight with.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.