Help support TMP


"A Near Run Thing - Howarth" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board

Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Dapple Grey Horses

A guide to how Stronty Girl Fezian paints grey horses - specifically, dapple greys.


Featured Book Review


1,267 hits since 30 Apr 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Sebastian Palmer30 Apr 2015 11:46 p.m. PST

picture

Hello

My Waterloo reading mania continues unabated. Recently read and reviewed David Howarth's splendid A Near Run Thing:

link

shorter review on Amazon:

link

Let me know here or on my blog if you enjoyed the review.
Cheers

Sebastian

4th Cuirassier01 May 2015 5:23 a.m. PST

Does he claim Waterloo was a British victory?

I have been trying since about 1998 to source an actual British writer on Waterloo who makes this claim. The only one I've come across was in an R J Unstead children's history book.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP01 May 2015 9:00 a.m. PST

I have the same book under the title Waterloo: Day of Battle. It is an excellent read with a skillful paraphrasing of eyewitness accounts.

Who asked this joker01 May 2015 9:39 a.m. PST

Sounds like the book I read in college. Same guy the wrote the one on Trafalgar right?

I thought he did the Trafalgar book fairly impartially. I thought his bias showed a little in the Waterloo book. Not too much but you could kind of tell. From memory, I was left with the impression that he felt that Wellington didn't need Blucher. Still a fine read.

Trajanus01 May 2015 10:31 a.m. PST

I have been trying since about 1998 to source an actual British writer on Waterloo who makes this claim.

Try contacting Hofschroer, he may have a list.

4th Cuirassier01 May 2015 10:51 a.m. PST

Try contacting Hofschroer, he may have a list.

I don't think he does. I've looked in the bibiography and he cites I think one or perhaps two English language historians. So it is a bit of mystery where this claim came from.

Where Hoffie is now, he probably doesn't have access to a library.

svsavory01 May 2015 12:50 p.m. PST

I read Howarth's book years ago when I was in school, it was in the school library. It really sparked my interest in the Napoleonic period and especially Waterloo. I've since acquired a used copy for my collection, mostly for nostalgia.

Edit: Nice review, Sebastian!

Dances with Clydesdales01 May 2015 3:48 p.m. PST

I too read this when I was at school, not a bad read.

matthewgreen02 May 2015 3:33 a.m. PST

Yes this was my favourite account as a teenager. It made the whole thing come alive. As I became more interested in the nuts and bolts, its appeal diminished. But if somebody wants to read a single book about the battle, this one still takes a lot of beating. I can say that about very few books on the wars written at that time – a bit of a low ebb so far as proper historical writing was concerned.

goragrad02 May 2015 1:52 p.m. PST

Amusingly I just finished this (Atheneum edition – Waterloo – Day of Battle) last week. Very interesting read.

Having just finished it I would say my impression was that the arrival of the Prussians on the ridge was portrayed as being the deciding factor.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.