Help support TMP


"Historical fortresses against alien invaders" Topic


14 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Victorian SF Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Starship Storage Stands

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian searches for a better way to store his starships.


Featured Profile Article

Back of Beyond Photo Report

Reader Michael Thompson sends in these Back of Beyond photos from the club where he games.


Featured Book Review


1,017 hits since 12 Apr 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
tsofian12 Apr 2015 5:48 p.m. PST

It dawned on me that of all the Major European Powers the British are the least well provided with fortifications defending the landward approaches to their capital city and other major urban areas during the later Victorian/Edwardian. In either the Anglo-Hive War or the Martian Invasion London has almost no functional landward defenses whatsoever. The cities of France, Belgium, the Netherlands, The Austrian Empire and the German Empire are generally protected by fortress rings or at the least older city walls. London has pretty much nothing. Now in the Hive War the aliens get stopped at the edge of Somerset. In War of the Worlds the aliens march right into London and straight on through. Although the heat rays are deadly they are line of sight weapons and most period fortresses mounted high angle howitzers and mortars. Tripods versus Brailmont fortifications would make an interesting fight.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP12 Apr 2015 6:34 p.m. PST

There was a ring of land forts around Portsmouth built in the 1860s but they were not as up to date as the Brailmont style.

legatushedlius13 Apr 2015 3:26 a.m. PST

There were the London Defence Positions. A couple of them aren't far from where I live.

link

TheBeast Supporting Member of TMP13 Apr 2015 5:23 a.m. PST

Tripod beta to Tripod leader: Sarge, why ain't we advancing on the 'uman dugouts?

Tripod leader: We're waiting for the bloody wind to change. Be a shame to waste the green and black killing the dead bodies behind us, you git!

Doug

wminsing13 Apr 2015 8:21 a.m. PST

Yes, I suspect that Martian 'gas warfare' would be just the ticket for dealing with human fortifications.

-Will

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP13 Apr 2015 11:50 a.m. PST

Ironically, reinforced concrete will be the perfect defense against Martian heat rays. Just make the walls tall and steep enough that they can't climb over them.

tsofian13 Apr 2015 3:52 p.m. PST

The major ports of the Royal navy had landward defenses, often called Palmerston's Follies since he was the PM that funded them. Built in the 1850s-1860s they certainly were not up to the standard of continental fortifications built 10-30 years later, especially after the invention of high explosives changed everything and brought about a revolution in design and construction. The London Defense Positions are a bit later and are interesting as they were never intended to form a defensive line, but were more to support he mobilization of the Volunteers.

In HQC the fortifications of Plymouth (built at the same time as the defenses of Portsmouth and other locations like Chatham) play a critical role in defeating the Hive.

Any forts would have initially been vulnerable to chemical warfare but they could have been protected from gas fairly easily.A lot would depend upon how quickly the Martians could move compared to how rapidly effective gas countermeasures could be put into place.

tsofian13 Apr 2015 4:04 p.m. PST

link

Here is a great site on the period British fortification

TheBeast Supporting Member of TMP14 Apr 2015 3:10 a.m. PST

.A lot would depend upon how quickly the Martians could move…

I'm figuring the real question would be how quickly the Martians could bring in real weapons of war instead of the obvious simple pest control of the first wave.

Doug

Personal logo optional field Supporting Member of TMP14 Apr 2015 7:02 a.m. PST

I would think the Royal Navy would be a tad bit cross about building fortresses around the capital. After all, the paramount function of the RN is to keep invaders from making landfall in the first place.

wminsing14 Apr 2015 7:35 a.m. PST

Yes, but as steam engines were introduced there was a MAJOR crisis of confidence in government circles about the ability of the RN to prevent a landing by an enemy army. The basic thinking was that with sail-powered ships the RN had a very good handle on how to prevent an enemy force getting out and then to a suitable anchorage, but with steam powered ships the potential enemy options expanded immensely. Even folks like the Duke of Wellington advocated fortification of the coast and further inland. The RN *did* disagree with this assessment, but it took a couple of decades before their opinion became the dominant one again.

-Will

tsofian14 Apr 2015 3:20 p.m. PST

Doug
That is a good question and there are several ways to answer it. If the heat ray is a Martian fly swatter what do they use for big game?

TheBeast Supporting Member of TMP17 Apr 2015 8:10 a.m. PST

Fair dinkum, but I was talking about other that line-of-sight.

I was thinking strictly of the Martian 'fumigation'.

Doug

Lion in the Stars18 Apr 2015 9:47 a.m. PST

No, the Martian Heat Ray is a brush-clearing tool, just like a flamethrower today.

So your typical Wellsian tripod has an engineering tool and a chemical sprayer.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.