Help support TMP


"Looking for details on Shaffert's VF-111 F-8" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Painting Message Board

Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Bannon's Boys for Team Yankee

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is finally getting into Team Yankee.


Featured Profile Article

Cobblestone Corners Christmas Trees

Christmas trees for your gaming table.


Current Poll


Featured Movie Review


1,440 hits since 9 Apr 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Windward09 Apr 2015 7:01 p.m. PST

I'm trying to paint up Dick Shaffert's F-8 off the Oriskany in '67, in which he had the epic duel with 6 MiGs. I'm trying to find a top view of the wings. The Dogfights video shows a stylized AH on the right wing tip with 106 on the flaps. However the furball decal set says there was no wing top markings. The Osprey Crusader in Vietnam book's profile view shows something on the wing. I checked out the Cruise book with hopes of a top shot but no joy.

Can anyone verify what was on top of the wing?

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP09 Apr 2015 7:59 p.m. PST

Looks like he didn't have anything! Check this out:
kitmaniac.com/site/?p=2639
You can click on those to enlarge. In the one that has the wing images, Schaffert's plane (146999) is second row, fourth one. Looking at the other planes represented, it appears it was uncommon but not unheard of to have no markings on the starboard wing.

FWIW, I trust the scale modelers to get this stuff right. They make our button counters look like rank amateurs.

CAG 1911 Apr 2015 4:20 a.m. PST

I don't think that 146999 is correct. I can count buttons with the best of them

It doesn't appear on the buno/modex assignment for CVW-16 for the 67/68 cruise and 106/146989 is the one on both the go.navy.jp site and in this picture
link

The pic is credited with the 67 cruise dates

Which is why maybe the pics of 146999 don't show the wing art. The pic with 146999 with AH tail codes is a later pic. 146989 is an operational loss so never survived.

CAG 1911 Apr 2015 8:12 a.m. PST

Can't find any photo reference of the wing serials or air wing identifier. 146989 is definitely the correct BuNo and not 146999. The VF-11/VF-111 book confirms it as well while describing the combat loss of 106 in 1968, but then goes on to quote 146999 in the colour plate…oh well

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP11 Apr 2015 8:41 a.m. PST

I did find this for one of Schaffert's squadron members, but I don't know their source.

link

Frustrating too, that Orsikany's Cruise Book for '67-'68 is online and VF-111 has one of the worst selection of plane pics in the Air Wing!

link

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP11 Apr 2015 8:45 a.m. PST

And I'm an idiot because I just realized Windward referenced the Furball decals in his original post…

Windward11 Apr 2015 9:02 a.m. PST

I contacted the naval aviation history museum in Pensacola FL. They too have a dearth of top photos of VF-111.

Tom: There is a dearth of top view photos of the F-8 aircraft. From examining our collection, for the 1967 era VF-111 aircraft paint schemes, I could see no wing top markings other than a National Insignia on the top left wing. The only other visible paint other than the gray airframe coloring is the red wing tip paint which curls around the tip above and below). There is no modex numbers to be seen on the upper wing or flaps. We could not locate a VF-111 squadron cruise book.

Curt Lawson
Library Research Volunteer
NNAM; NAS Pensacola, FL

I'm in contact with the Gunfighter group I hope they can clue me in.

The problem is Old Nick 106 is not a MiG killer so not as well documented as any MiG killer. Interesting I that its recorded as 146999 not 146989

Mako1111 Apr 2015 11:43 a.m. PST

Pretty easy to make a typo, back in the day (or even today), and not notice it.

Also, far less easy to correct as well, since you've got to retype an entire page manually, if that number is included in a written report.

Windward13 Apr 2015 3:25 p.m. PST

From the Man himself:

"I have a few "pri-fly" pics of CAG 16 F8s that have only the star on the left wing and nothing on the right. Note: History channel (radicalranch) did not ask for any pics from me. I'm not sure what they were using as sources for their paint jobs."

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.