Help support TMP


"Scientists Say It’s Time to Reinstate the Brontosaurus" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Prehistoric Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Eureka Amazon Project: Nude Phalangites

More figures for the 28mm Amazon army!


Featured Workbench Article

Painting the Castle Kits Egyptian Temple Entrance

Minidragon Fezian finishes his Temple project by painting the kit he previously assembled.


Featured Profile Article

GameCon '98

The Editor tries out this first-year gaming convention in the San Francisco Bay Area (California).


Current Poll


1,104 hits since 8 Apr 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0108 Apr 2015 2:59 p.m. PST

"Remember Pluto? Tiny lonely rock orbiting the sun at the edge of the solar system? And then, in 2006, researchers summarily defrocked the little world of its status as a planet. Poof! Gone.

This kind of thing has happened before. Many decades ago, paleontologists similarly decided that there wasn't enough evidence to support the existence of the beloved Brontosaurus. Instead, they said that the noble thunder lizard was just an Apatosaurus. Poof.

But mourn the Brontosaurus no longer! A team of heroes may have rescued it from paleontological purgatory. By cross-referencing the digitized bones from hundreds of long-necked cousins, a team of European scientists now says that they've identified enough unique anatomical details to reinstate the Brontosaurus at the head of its own genus. That's not all. "The real importance of this paper is this is the first time that this group of sauropods have been analyzed in a big fashion," says Mark Norell, the top paleontologist at the American Museum of Natural History in New York…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Mako1108 Apr 2015 5:32 p.m. PST

So, does this mean I'll finally be able to get a Bronto burger like Fred could, from the local drive-in?

Man, those ribs are gonna be filling, and expensive.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP08 Apr 2015 6:11 p.m. PST

Hurrah! A triumph for the '50s.

John the OFM08 Apr 2015 8:49 p.m. PST

Bring back Pluto as a planet first!

langobard09 Apr 2015 5:09 a.m. PST

Pluto has to fight for itself, the brontosaurus is much more important!

Tango0109 Apr 2015 10:30 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

rmaker09 Apr 2015 11:45 a.m. PST

The problem with Brontosaurus was NOT lack of definition, but prior usage of the name (and secondarily a side effect the Marsh-Cope feud). However, the first use of Brontosaurus has been proved erroneous, and "younger" paleontologists (those who grew up with Brontosaurus) have been pushing for allowing Apatasaurus to revert to the earlier name for some time. As older paleontologists die off, they are coming closer to success.

Double W09 Apr 2015 1:09 p.m. PST

Bully!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.