Help support TMP


"Stone Age Sex Surprise" Topic


19 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Prehistoric Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Comitatus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Undead Dinos III

The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

Groundcloths & Battlesheets

Wargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.


2,011 hits since 1 Apr 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian01 Apr 2015 8:47 p.m. PST

Scientists are puzzling over a new discovery regarding Stone Age sex: It seems that for every 17 women who reproduced at the time, just one man did the same.

The findings are based on an analysis of the DNA of 450 people from geographically diverse locations. Researchers compared Y-chromosome DNA, which is inherited only from our male forbears, with mitochondrial DNA, which comes from women, Pacific Standard reports.

Such analysis can show experts our numbers of male and female ancestors, and the mystery here is why these ancient numbers are so out of whack…

link

darthfozzywig01 Apr 2015 8:57 p.m. PST

Better than Stone Age Surprise Sex – that's awkward.

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian01 Apr 2015 9:10 p.m. PST

I thought that was Quest for Fire

witteridderludo01 Apr 2015 9:17 p.m. PST

Only the Alpha male got to have sex? Happens in other animals too

StarfuryXL501 Apr 2015 10:57 p.m. PST

Maybe the other 16 cavemen were ogling cavegirls dressed up in saber-tooth tigersuits.

Pedrobear01 Apr 2015 11:39 p.m. PST

"16 out of every 17 cavemen were gay"

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP02 Apr 2015 2:40 a.m. PST

Interesting.

I know that with some animals, the only male that mates with the females is the leader of the pack. Juvenile males are tolerated then driven away as they reach maturity.

I wouldn't have thought such instinctual behaviour would apply to humans, though.

GarrisonMiniatures02 Apr 2015 4:14 a.m. PST

Yes, I think I would look on this as a way of suggesting group size and dominant male harems rather than anything else.

David Manley02 Apr 2015 5:58 a.m. PST

Implications for stone age army lists?

RavenscraftCybernetics02 Apr 2015 7:37 a.m. PST

thats why they discovered that ancient d20 the other day.

doug redshirt02 Apr 2015 7:54 a.m. PST

Actually the period covered by the study is during the age of farming, not nomadic hunter gather.

Great War Ace02 Apr 2015 8:05 a.m. PST

And thus was invented, "the oral sex".

There's a reason why raids to obtain women were "invented". And you move far away with your acquisitions….

rmaker02 Apr 2015 8:48 a.m. PST

It should be noted that the methodology of this study is very dodgy.

JimSelzer02 Apr 2015 10:31 p.m. PST

dead before they reached mating age perhaps? learning to hunt probably had quite a steep learning curve

Personal logo miniMo Supporting Member of TMP03 Apr 2015 8:00 a.m. PST

"16 out of every 17 cavemen were gay" is one of many good interpretaions of the data.

Another is that 16 our of 17 male lineages were obliterated through feuds, clan warfare, and general mayhem and mishap. If all of the Rubble boys kill all of the Flintstone boys, then Fred's Y-chromosome dna ceases to be passed down along through the males. But Wilma and Pebbles mitochondrial power of The Force continues on.

sumerandakkad15 Apr 2015 2:16 p.m. PST

Strong family ties perhaps with male groupings ensuring security?

TwinMirror17 Apr 2015 9:56 a.m. PST

This 'discovery' is more likely a statistical artefact; y-chromosone dna is highly unstable, while mitochondrial dna is extremely stable, so that a multitude of lineages is likely to survive for far longer, while y-chromosones fade from the actual genetic record, leaving an illusion of relatively few stable male lineages…Likewise, anthropological data just doesn't support the idea of large harems.
The illusion of a limited number of male 'genetic founders' keeps cropping up, however, undoutedly because the fantasy of large harems appeals to quite a few men.

Dark Fable05 May 2015 6:18 a.m. PST

Probably a very high mortality rate for young virile males

Personal logo ochoin Supporting Member of TMP08 May 2015 4:12 p.m. PST

@ TW

Interesting post. Thanks.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.