Help support TMP


"China's Nightmare: Vietnam's New Killer Submarines" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Team Yankee


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


833 hits since 29 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0129 Mar 2015 11:09 p.m. PST

"After a brief respite, the South China Sea cauldron is starting to boil once again. This time, the hub-bub concerns not a close call between aircraft, nor dueling flotillas of coast guard vessels surrounding a mysterious oil exploration rig, nor the precarious resupply of a rusted out hulk of a ship grounded purposefully on an obscure reef

Rather, the current frenzy among journalists, strategists, and now legislators concerns a variety of new structures that Beijing has undertaken to build up in and around its occupied reefs in the Spratlys. These structures will likely include an airfield.

While this recent construction makes for interesting satellite photos, the impact on the actual naval balance of power seems quite minimal: limited to perhaps somewhat improved Chinese surveillance in the southern part of the South China Sea.

However, Beijing already enjoys relatively plentiful sources of intelligence regarding "maritime domain awareness" in this sensitive, contested domain, so the actual change is minimal. Lest anyone get too excited, all these reefs (and related structures) are easily turned into "glass" by any reasonably modern military power in the age of precision-guided weapons…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

cwlinsj29 Mar 2015 11:39 p.m. PST

Hope they get all 6 subs up and running ASAP. Let China know their expansionism will be resisted.

Mako1129 Mar 2015 11:54 p.m. PST

An unsinkable aircraft carrier at sea, far away from your own territory isn't "quite minimal" in terms of tactical, or strategic impact in the region.

Naval bases are being constructed too, that can support refueling of their short range missile boats, and radar surveillance coverage far from home.

Klebert L Hall30 Mar 2015 6:37 a.m. PST

Since Vietnam and the PRC share a land border, the naval side of any conflict between the two is unlikely to be decisive.
-Kle.

Sobieski30 Mar 2015 6:45 a.m. PST

It would be important. The fight would spread, I'm afraid.

Lion in the Stars30 Mar 2015 11:31 a.m. PST

@Kle: Last time the Chinese tried to pick a fight with the Vietnamese, the PLA got their butts handed to them on a silver platter. I suspect that more than a few Chinese generals got their heads handed to them, too.

Granted, the PAVN had a whole lot of troops in service then that had lots of combat experience fighting Americans, but they still kicked the crap out of the Chinese.

Garand30 Mar 2015 11:37 a.m. PST

IMHO just because Vietnam beat the Chinese over 35 years ago, doesn't mean the same thing would happen today. The Chinese army of today is nothing like the one then, just as the Vietnamese army.

Damon.

Klebert L Hall31 Mar 2015 10:01 a.m. PST

Yes, Viet Nam did well.

Do you actually believe that with the will to fight an real war, the PRC couldn't have worn them down, though?

They went in expecting an easy time of it, then when they didn't get it, they stopped.

PRC forces have improved since then, too.
-Kle.

Cacique Caribe31 Mar 2015 1:03 p.m. PST

Russian subs.

If they were actually Vietnam subs would they be made of bamboo?

Dan

Cacique Caribe31 Mar 2015 1:05 p.m. PST

Be afraid. Be very afraid …

picture

link

Dan

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.