Help support TMP


"Brandywine scenario from W.I.311 a work in progress" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 18th Century Scenarios Message Board


Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Warfare in the Age of Reason


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Dung Gate

For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.


Featured Book Review


1,200 hits since 18 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

dayglowill18 Mar 2015 9:55 a.m. PST

It's always nice to have something to aim for. While I've been painting my figures from multiple copies of the board game Risk, one of the things that inspired me was an feature in Wargames Illustrated issue 311, about a Black Powder scenario played by Dan Faulconbridge and Rick Priestly, based on the assault on Birmingham Hill. Reading Brandywine by Michael C Harris only added to my enthusiasm.

As I've now painted all the figures I need to stage this scenario I decided to get the toys on the table (3'2" x 4'5") to get an idea of how everything fits together and make a more informed decision about what scenery I still need to build. While I was at it I took a few photos.

The view from behind the Continental Line on Birmingham Hill:

picture

The view from across the Brandywine behind the Continental left:
picture

And finally the view from behind the British line:
picture

As you will see it's no competition looks wise for the original. :-) Just like Messrs P & F though I have chosen not to "stand on ceremony with regard to figure representation". An easy decision to make when my copies of Risk provides just 2 very similar variants of "hatmen". I've also decided to make my standard unit size 16 figures, any bigger and I'd have needed to buy more figures, that still gives me a total of 684 infantry on the table.

With regards to scenery it's clear that a lot more fence building is needed, also some buildings. Otherwise the question is whether to play the scenario as published, or tweak it somewhat to reflect my understanding of the battle. I'm not entirely convinced by the idea of the fords as victory objectives.

Rogues118 Mar 2015 1:35 p.m. PST

Living close to the actual battlefield, I would say you need more trees and the hill is a lot more pronounced. I am not an expert by any stretch on AWI battles or the rules, but the current location (I know some may argue that the actual battle was fought elsewhere) has more trees and a higher hill. I also think that just getting away was the major objective of the Continentals.

dayglowill18 Mar 2015 2:14 p.m. PST

Thank you Rogues1. So far I've based the scenery on the magazine article, which does indeed have a few more trees, but doesn't really emphasise the hill. Thankfully I have quite a lot of trees "in stock" and they aren't too much of a bother to put together.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.