Help support TMP


"micro FOW" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Flames of War Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One
World War Two on the Land
Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

15mm WWI British Machinegun Platoon

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds a machinegun platoon to his WWI Brits.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,383 hits since 15 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

brianmc15 Mar 2015 7:57 a.m. PST

My group is going to try useing micro armor for FOW. I know some of you are doing this and would like your oppinions. what infantry stand size do you find works best for this scale? I was thining of useing the small fow stands for this. I was wondering how the inf stand size effected the assault rules in this scale

The Beast Rampant15 Mar 2015 8:08 a.m. PST

I have considered getting into FoW in this fashion, using half-squads on 25mm-square bases.

I have no idea how you could use "official" bases with 6mm- how do you even pick them up?

McWong7315 Mar 2015 9:42 a.m. PST

As long as the same basing convention is used it shouldn't be too bad.

myrm1115 Mar 2015 10:07 a.m. PST

For 6mm at our clubs we just base down one size, so anything on a rage base in 15mm would go to a medium, and small bases get cut in half.

Lion in the Stars15 Mar 2015 12:43 p.m. PST

Most of the folks I've read about talking about it have just used the standard base sizes and rules as written. Which gets the short-range groundscale much closer to the figure scale. No hub-to-hub tank phalanxes because the tanks are 1/27th the volume, and the infantry looks better when spread out that much.

Changing the stand size will mostly affect assault and artillery as opposed to anything else. Artillery because the stands are a little smaller and increase the number of stands potentially under the template, and assault because the stands will have to be a squidge closer to give defensive fire.

And since I like to screw with rules as little as possible, that means leaving the stand size alone. Besides, it makes the infantry look better when they're ~5m apart instead of 5 feet apart in groundscale.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP15 Mar 2015 6:33 p.m. PST

I have run FoW in "half scale" and it works a treat. In fact I'm in the midst of cataloging the collection and working toward a "big" game this Spring.

I make rulers marked in half inches, and put everything on half-size bases. So large bases are 1 x 1.25". Medium bases are 25 x 16mm and small bases are 15x15mm. I just ordered custom steel bases.

It makes your table huge and a $10 USD pack of infantry will get you three big platoons!

I hope to post some pictures of my figs in the next few days….

myrm1117 Mar 2015 2:14 a.m. PST

We found that the smaller bases didn't affect things too much – artillery maybe an extra stand or two under the template (except for Russian infantry hordes) because the largest part of the manoeuvre units footprint was separation distances between units rather than the unit base size. Assault still came down to the same platoons involved usually.

So used the smaller base size with the rules on ranges, templates, movement distances etc unchanged….essentially shrinking the minis for aesthetic value.

For extra room to manoeuvre we found it was more important to play on a large enough table for the points – the steady increase in 'standard' army size from 1500 points crowded tables badly and we found even at 1500 points we played better games on 7'x5' table spaces and for 2000 it wa vital to be that large.

Lion in the Stars17 Mar 2015 11:29 a.m. PST

For extra room to manoeuvre we found it was more important to play on a large enough table for the points – the steady increase in 'standard' army size from 1500 points crowded tables badly and we found even at 1500 points we played better games on 7'x5' table spaces and for 2000 it wa vital to be that large.
This is soooo true!

1500 points on a 4x6, 2000 on a 4x8. 2500-3000 needs to be on a 6x8.

myrm1124 Mar 2015 10:01 a.m. PST

We did 10000 on 18foot by 7 foot tables….that was a heavy day

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.