Help support TMP


"Rebs and Yanks - What type of coats did they wear?" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Painting Guides Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Peter Pig Mortar Schooner

The G Dog Fezian replicates a mortar schooner at Fort Jackson during the New Orleans campaign.


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


Featured Book Review


1,778 hits since 5 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

coopman05 Mar 2015 6:37 p.m. PST

Frock coats, sack coats, shell jackets…which side's soldiers predominately wore each type? I've got a bunch of Perry plastic soldiers to assemble. Thanks for your help.
Clay

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2015 6:45 p.m. PST

Federals mainly wore sack coats

Rebels mainly in shell jackets

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2015 6:47 p.m. PST

Though of course there were exceptions. Certain units on both sides had frock coats at certain points in the war, and a northern state or two issued shell jackets to state troops early on.

45thdiv05 Mar 2015 6:52 p.m. PST

Mix and match. Western theater will be a bit different than eastern theater, but there would be more consistence in the Union army as a general rule. Lots of good book and web pages with this information

zippyfusenet05 Mar 2015 7:02 p.m. PST

What rvandusen said in the first place. Yankees: sacks. Rebels: shells. Gamers put far too many sack coats on Confederates.

Look at the contemporary art, photos, overwhelmingly blue sacks and grey shells.

Yes, there were exceptions, especially early war. If you're building an 1861 army, have fun putting your Confederates into frock coats, your Ohio and Indiana volunteers into grey shells. New York issued shell jackets to volunteers throughout the war. But once a regiment wore out their first issue and started drawing replacement clothing from the depots, it was sacks and shells.

The Perry plastics are a frustrating mix of coat styles. I'm going to mix just a couple of sack-coated figures into my Rebs, and just a couple of shells (as cut-down frock coats) into my Yanks. But just a couple.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP05 Mar 2015 7:27 p.m. PST

As noted, shell jackets for the Rebs, frock coats/sack coats for the Yanks

I agree with the Perry plastics – I bought a couple of boxes so I could match up the figs for Union units

zippyfusenet05 Mar 2015 8:56 p.m. PST

The thing about the Perry plastic ACW is…half the figures are marching, half the figures are skirmishing, half of each type are in sacks vs. shells. So if you want a set of figures with a theme – Confederates marching, or Federals skirmishing, f'rinstance, only a quarter of the figures in the box meet the criteria. Worse, only three poses meet the criteria for each category, so you can't get as much variety as you'd like.

I was sorely tempted to mix the poses and disregard the coat styles. But in the end, like Frederick, I bought a couple more boxes…

hocklermp506 Mar 2015 12:18 a.m. PST

I have heard that the first Perry ACW infantry set the sculpts were not so hot. Same for the cavalry but the rebs in shell jackets far better along with the Zouaves. I heard somewhere the Perrys are going to rework the first two ACW sets. If anyone has the first two ACW sets I would like to know your opinion on the sculpts. OK, I am finished hijacking this thread.

coopman06 Mar 2015 5:32 a.m. PST

I am starting with 4 boxes of their ACW infantry, so hopefully I can group enough like poses together to get them to look OK.

zippyfusenet06 Mar 2015 5:36 a.m. PST

I have several boxes of the first infantry set. Other than the criticism I have made above, I like the sculpts just fine. They show good, realistic anatomy and poses, good uniform and equipment detail. Good detail over-all, without being exaggerated, as in some metal figures.

Most figures are single pose, but a few allow separate arms to be attached. These, and the duplicate sets of slouch hats vs. fatigue caps allow some nice options without being too fiddly, especially if you're willing to do a little conversion work – plastic is much easier to work with than metal.

Over all, I like the set very well. I just wish it had been more focused on Confederate vs. Federal, marching vs. skirmishing.

The Gray Ghost06 Mar 2015 5:55 p.m. PST

I was sorely tempted to mix the poses and disregard the coat styles. But in the end, like Frederick, I bought a couple more boxes…

that's the point of them mixing poses

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.