Help support TMP


"Priciest weapons programs you probably haven't heard about" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Amazon's Fighting Snowmen

Who has armed the snowmen, and to whom does their allegiance belong?


Featured Profile Article

Ammunition Hill 1967

Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.


Current Poll


712 hits since 5 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0105 Mar 2015 5:22 p.m. PST

"Roughly $70 USD billion in Pentagon weapon systems are deemed major acquisition programs. But it's the other $100 USD billion that's a bit more of a mystery.

Here's how the Pentagon categorizes its weapons systems: There's the major acquisition programs, known as acquisition category I, or ACAT I, which are expected to cost more than $480 USD million in research, development, testing and evaluation, or more than $2.79 USD billion in procurement funds. According to a report from the Government Accountability Office released Monday, those programs accounted for about 40 percent of the $168 USD billion spent in fiscal 2014 to develop, test and acquire weapon systems and other products and equipment.

Then there's the rest — dubbed ACAT II and ACAT III programs — that the GAO reported have fewer reporting requirements and are overseen at lower organizational levels, despite the fact that they may have annual funding needs that are just as significant. The GAO doesn't know for sure, because the Department of Defense could not provide sufficiently reliable data for the GAO to determine the number, total cost, or performance of those programs…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

capncarp05 Mar 2015 8:28 p.m. PST

Remember the gold-plated toilet seats?
_Platinum_, baby!

Tango0106 Mar 2015 10:30 a.m. PST

(smile)

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.