Help support TMP


"Troops used in the Norman conquest of Sicily" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Armati


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Workbench Article

Jay Wirth Paints 15mm Crusaders for DBA

Jay Wirth Fezian shows how using inks makes it easier to paint a 15mm scale army.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Featured Book Review


2,534 hits since 6 Feb 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP06 Feb 2015 2:48 p.m. PST

Hi everyone!

Does anyone have any information on likely small force composition of the Arabic and Byzantine groups fighting for and against the Normans?

I am trying to do army lists for skirmishing, if that helps?

Thanks in advance for any help!

DeHewes06 Feb 2015 3:13 p.m. PST

As mercenaries in the early Italo-Norman period, the Norman composition was more typical Norman. As they began conquering their own territories in southern Italy and Sicily in the 1050s-1070s, they added locals to their forces. This included Arab & Greek archers, slingers. Arab horse would have been used in a scout or skirmishing capacity. One piece of fiction on the period (Alfred Duggan's excellent The Lady for Ransom) mentions horse archers as well.

Louie N06 Feb 2015 3:57 p.m. PST

link

This is an excellent read on the events, people, and places.

Great War Ace06 Feb 2015 6:16 p.m. PST

Arabic or Saracen pirates preyed upon the coasts from Sicily and North Africa throughout the period. Byzantine garrison troops were more "Italian" than Byzantine. If "the City" sent troops to help, they often were not empirical regulars, but mercenaries and could be anything from "Turks" to "Franks". The militia system of Thematic troops had largely disappeared by the mid to late 11th century. But an army list including the possibility of troops with "Roman" training, regulars or thematics, as an "elite" core around which to build a force of locals and mercenaries, would be reasonable. Norman forces (as already mentioned) would include "Lombard" troops from the towns and subjugated/allied duchies. Later, as they get into Sicily, they start using agreeable Muslim auxiliaries, until finally the Muslim element can comprise up to fifty percent of a Siculo-Norman army. Mostly foot archers and spear with javelins. Cavalry would be lancers with javelins, and horse archers.…

Druzhina06 Feb 2015 10:21 p.m. PST
Lewisgunner07 Feb 2015 4:56 a.m. PST

Druzhina has given some excellent stuff there. The Normans had their knights who made a huge impression, both literally and metaphorically on the Arabs. They also had local Lonbard cavalry, equipped as the knights, Bleeped textibly round shields, but not as fierce. They imported troops to garrison the cities they took so likely they could put infantry spearmen and skirmishing bowmen, crossbowmen and slingers into the field. A source later than the conquest has staff slings. These are the sort of weapons that you would use on a ship too as the staff sling had good range and
The Arabs in Sicily relied heavily on Africa for support and brought over Berber Light cavalry doubtless infantry to support their Arab HC and spear and bow infantry. Of course they could also have local skirmshing Lughts such as javelinmen and skirmish bows and maybe slings too.
The battles really depended upon the cavalry and I wonder if, because the Arab HC could not stand up to a charge of Norman knights the fights revolved around the cavalry engagement and and when the knights beat the Arab HC their infantry gave up.

The Last Conformist07 Feb 2015 8:47 a.m. PST

Where'd Siculo-Arab horse archers come from? In the core Arab lands, horse archers are generally Turkish imports, and Sicily seems an odd place to pick up the habit.

Great War Ace07 Feb 2015 10:26 a.m. PST

"Saracen" horse archers always existed separately from "Turkish" horse archers. By Ayyubid times, the core mamluk or askari cavalry were generally "Saracen" rather than "Turkish". These usually stood to shoot, rather than doing Parthian shots and the like. In my army list for Italo- and Siculo-Norman armies, I have the Muslim horse archers performing mobile archery, i.e. at a trot ("hand gallop") like Turks do. But I'm not sure that is accurate. Based on later (not that much later) eye witness descriptions from the Crusades, Saracen horse archers did not work that way….

Personal logo Herkybird Supporting Member of TMP07 Feb 2015 1:25 p.m. PST

This is all great, I am glad I asked here!

Keep it coming guys! – and thanks!

Druzhina07 Feb 2015 8:27 p.m. PST

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.