Help support TMP


"When Did "Apostles" Fall Out of Use?" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Acolyte Vampires - Based

The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


1,582 hits since 5 Jan 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Beast Rampant05 Jan 2015 3:20 p.m. PST

…And before anyone says it, yes, I know it's not a contemporary term, but everybody knows what I am talking about.

I read somewhere the French bigwigs ordered charger bandoliers gone in the late 1670's (I think), though that didn't likely take effect for several years. I really can't find anything on other nationalities.

So, other than me having to squint at a bunch more pictures, does anyone have know of any documented evidence (or primary source scuttlebutt, or whatever) regarding when chargers were finally phased out? Were colonial troops using them later still?

MajorB05 Jan 2015 3:58 p.m. PST

When paper cartridges became available.

michaelsbagley05 Jan 2015 4:23 p.m. PST

The phase out likely began in the 1660s, but I have seen documentation of their use up into the 1690s. There may be evidence to later usage.

Like many things in history, the transition likely moved in increments.

The Beast Rampant05 Jan 2015 6:05 p.m. PST

Bill is enacting his mandatory five-plus business day "cooling off period" before reactvating my membership. Apparently, he feels I only re-up in the heat of wanting to send off a barrage of hate-spewing PM's, and to streak the Lounge.

I can only imagine how many gloating, anti- FSU posts Smokey has made in my absence.

So, the upturn of such aggravation is, either the teacher reads your little note in front of the class, or I can't HEAR YOU. (fingers in ears)

Sweden doesn't count. They switched early, though they still pined for their crossbows, and courted the Queen of Battle longer than most.

Ilodic05 Jan 2015 7:15 p.m. PST

I have some ideas:

First of all, why was the paper cartridge used?

You could prime and load your musket with the same grain powder.

Why is this important? It is faster.


There is also a rather obvious point not addressed here (although I think I brought this up in a post quite some time ago) and that is the relationship between the bandolier and the matchlock musket.

For most matchlocks, priming was done from a priming horn or flask, a much finer, and probably a more expensive powder (but not a lot needed.)


I have not seen many contemporary depictions of a matchlock loaded with a cartridge, let alone a firelock/flintlock with a bandolier.

The evolution of the flintlock, bayonet, paper cartridges all revolved, rather directly or indirectly, around the quality and quantity at which black powder could be produced. This in turn changed everything, and still did well into the 20th century.

If you are looking for something more specific, this book probably has it:

link

I have not looked at my copy in a while, but it does have some good firearm evolution material in it.

ilodic.

Daniel S06 Jan 2015 4:24 p.m. PST

Sweden doesn't count. They switched early, though they still pined for their crossbows, and courted the Queen of Battle longer than most.

Actually the idea that Gustavus Adolphus reformed the Swedish infantry to use cartridges is one of several myths unsupported by historical evidence. A look at the extensive documentation surviving in the Swedish War Archive shows that the Swedish infantry used bandoliers as standard equipment into the 1670's

The Last Conformist07 Jan 2015 10:55 a.m. PST

If you are looking for something more specific, this book probably has it:
Presumably because its coverage ends around 1600, the book, near as I can find via the index, only discusses cartridges wrt cannon, not small arms.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.