Help support TMP


"Manoeuvre board first try out" Topic


2 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Maps Message Board

Back to the Campaign Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Workbench Article

3Dprinting Markers

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian wonders if he can use his 3Dprinter to make markers.


Featured Profile Article

Gen Con So Cal 2006 Report

Wyatt the Odd Fezian reports from the final California Gen Con...


Current Poll


1,002 hits since 4 Dec 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Last Hussar04 Dec 2014 5:35 p.m. PST

Tried my pre-battle manoeuvre board out for the first time Monday
(for description TMP link)

Being ACW I threw extra woods in. I started a road in random locations on opposite sides (see previous – the numbers on the sides). To join them I started at one side and drew a tile – If 'open' I placed a road tile of my choice. If Terrain (hill/wood) I placed that, then put the 'skinny' road tile on top.

Then placed a couple of towns at random (again by using the 1-6 numbers to generate a grid square) – I had meant to do that first. The rest of the terrain was placed randomly from the mix.

As we hadn't used it before I used the simple movement method outlined previously – 1 square, must not increase range to enemy. As Sunjester (CSA) has more light cavalry (2 to 0) he was allowed diagonal moves.

This basic method worked – Our armies started opposite sides at random locations, and moved as described, the CSA had a nominal aim to get off my side; however getting a Victory over the Union would suffice – it would then manoeuvre unopposed on a (fictional for the purposes of this game) theatre map.

As we closed, Sunjester used his diagonals to pull me away from terrain he didn't want me defending. This lead to a battle at 90' to how we approached – we were to fight once adjacent. We ended up diagonal, and I had to choose which of the two squares next to him to move to. He had pulled me away from the heavier terrain, and into open areas- I would have preferred more woods to narrow his attack.

To generate the table we used one tile to one terrain tile (ie 1 tile = 2ft, though you could call a tile what you wanted). Each area was divided into 9 areas – 3 x 3, so '1' was top left, (we nominated one short end to be top), '5' middle, '8' bottom middle. We rolled 2 d10, and the terrain ran between the 2 sectors. A 0 meant roll again with an extra d10, so a third sector would be generated. Obviously two initial '0's would lead to 4 sectors, and I see no reason that further '0's could continue the process.

I have only a few tile types because LGG is such a high level game, but there is no reason in lower level games there can't be more types. 'Open' tiles can still have terrain if needed – it just means farmland, so fences could be generated for, say, F&F or BP.

The manoeuvre map gave us easily defined terrain quickly – no deciding what a 200 year old map might have meant (also trying to find a suitable map), with a chance to manoeuvre for advantage. The random table method meant that the placement was fair – the type was decided, and the placement not under player control.

We intend to do an expanded version with 'bells and whistles' – multiple map units, which will arrive as dictated by map movement once the game has started. (I am thinking 1 hour on the table is 1 square)

Last Hussar04 Dec 2014 6:56 p.m. PST

Link not working – try this

TMP link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.