"Indian Skin" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board Back to the Ancients Painting Guides Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleRemember back in 2005, when I promised pictures of those Sumerian chariot stands in 6mm?
Featured Profile ArticleGet these inexpensive dinos while you can.
Featured Book Review
|
Guthroth | 21 Nov 2014 4:31 p.m. PST |
I'm about to start on an Indian army from the period 500 – 100 BC and I wonder what you would suggest as a standard skin tone ? TIA |
Sobieski | 21 Nov 2014 6:31 p.m. PST |
The footsloggers would be significantly darker, pretty much from the Mauryas to the Moghuls. There's an enormous range of skin tones in India. The charioteers and elephant crews might look about right with a 50/50 mix of yellow ochre and Caucasian pink skin; in a smaller scale you might want to exaggerate the Asian look with more darkening and yellow, but they should look far from central African. Nobody seems to have the courage to go the whole way and give them the brightly-dyed beards that Duncan Head refers to. |
Trebian | 22 Nov 2014 3:07 a.m. PST |
I mainly use MA36 ("Eurasian Flesh" from colour party with a tinted varnish. I mostly didn't do dyed beards, but did on a couple of my command figures :-) |
TKindred | 22 Nov 2014 8:50 a.m. PST |
I would use a darker flesh for the rank & file, with a dark brown wash, or "Dark Tone" from Army Painter. For the rest of the army, I'd consider a dark flesh with a more modest brown wash to get a sort of "caramel" color for the skin. YMMV, but that's what I'd consider. |
Herkybird | 22 Nov 2014 3:49 p.m. PST |
In general, lighter skin tones in the north of India, darker further south, at least in modern India. Obviously darker if the chap has spent time in the sun! |
Bryan Stroup | 22 Nov 2014 7:35 p.m. PST |
This is the best article I've seen on painting skintones: link |
dragonsani1973 | 03 Jun 2015 2:21 p.m. PST |
Fab article especially as I am just getting into ancient Egyptians and nubians and sea people. |
TKindred | 03 Jun 2015 3:54 p.m. PST |
Here is another thing to consider: A great deal of the Indian army was wearing white, and others wore some "pastel" shade, though the higher caste folks had much better material and dyes, etc. Anyway, that white clothing, even if it is only a loincloth, per se, will make the exposed skin tones appear darker than they actually are. Therefore, you might want to play around a bit with lighter skin tones to see how the finished figure "looks". I prime with white, rather than black, and use a couple of thinner layers to get the skin tones I want, then add a wash of Army Painter soft tone or strong tone, depending upon the brightness of the clothing. |
JC Lira | 05 Jun 2015 9:39 a.m. PST |
This is going to sound absurd, but it really works. I paint my Indian skin purple, almost plum, and let that be the shadows, and paint all raised surfaces with a reddish brown. It gives them definition at a distance; they're richer and more eye-catching than just using shades of brown. Pics when I'm not super busy. |
|