Help support TMP


"Dremel has a new 3D printer!" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Hobby Industry Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,574 hits since 12 Nov 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP12 Nov 2014 1:54 p.m. PST

link

link

Okay, so at a 100 micron resolution and FDM printing, it isn't quite adequate for small-scale minis, but it would work fine for some hobby uses (Warmaster castles, for example). Mostly, I'm excited to see that a major hobby-tool brand has taken the plunge and is getting into the 3D printing market! This can only help lead to bigger and better things – cheaper printers with higher resolution.

Thought I'd share!
-jav98

Allen5712 Nov 2014 2:30 p.m. PST

Agree completely Jav but even Shapeways whom I assume offer the best resolution out there at a marginally decent print cost do not produce the best of miniatures. I know quite a few gamers who wont bother with 3D because of the resolution. It may be a long while yet before truly fine resolution printing becomes available at a reasonable price.

McWong7312 Nov 2014 2:40 p.m. PST

It's a rebadge of an existing model from China, but it's an important first big brand cheap printer. Keep an eye out for a similar priced line from HP next year.

Mako1112 Nov 2014 2:55 p.m. PST

Yea, I keep hearing about HP coming out with one, and also with Home Depot and/or UPS carrying them in their stores, and offering printing services to customers.

I wish someone local would offer printing services, of high quality, at a reasonable price. That would be a game-changer.

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian12 Nov 2014 3:19 p.m. PST

I'd say that 100 microns would be fine for 15mm vehicles, or even figures. the trick is getting the limbs thick enough to keep from breaking

McWong7312 Nov 2014 3:21 p.m. PST

The cost of materials is an equal price pressure, don't forget that!

GildasFacit Sponsoring Member of TMP12 Nov 2014 3:34 p.m. PST

100 micron resolution is pretty crude, even for 28mm figures, I doubt that many people would put up with that on a regular basis.

VonTed12 Nov 2014 4:01 p.m. PST

Man I want one of these to play with!

Personal logo gamertom Supporting Member of TMP12 Nov 2014 9:15 p.m. PST

Let's see here. A typical human hair is about 90 microns thick. It will take about 254 100 micron layers to equal 1". A 28mm figure (assuming 28mm from top of base to eye level then adding another 2 mm to account from eye level to top of head and then another 2 mm for base thickness for a total height of 32mm from table top to top of head for a figure standing at attention) would take 320 layers. The result is not going to be a smooth surface and is more likely to have a slightly ridged surface somewhat comparable to a coarse optical diffraction grating.

Another way of thinking about this is that for a 1/285 scale model (C-in-C microarmor scale), a 100 micron thick layer would represent slightly over an inch on the full scale item being modeled in 1/285 scale. Assuming 1/54 scale as being close to 28mm, then a 100 micron layer would represent about 0.2 inches on the full scale item. And for a 1/2400 scale ship, a 100 micron layer would represent between 9-10 inches on the full scale item (off the top of my head – haven't done the math) or larger than 5" gun barrels.

Or one can think of it as printing at 254 DPI. 300 DPI is deemed OK for most home use and 600 DPI is preferred for professional looking documents with pictures.

So to avoid being labeled as "crude resolution for a 28mm figure," it looks like having layers around 40 microns might be OK if one uses the 600 DPI comparison.

Is this what previous commenters have in mind for a good resolution on a 3D printer?

Meiczyslaw12 Nov 2014 10:26 p.m. PST

It blows the Makerbot printers out of the water on price, at least. It's got the same resolution as the Replicator, but not quite the build area, and at a third the price.

I've held Replicator products, and you can definitely feel the layers on certain faces -- my thought has always been that you'd want to base coat with a thick primer to smooth the valleys.

Probably best for larger, but less detailed, figures. I'm thinking 28mm Wild West, and not Napoleonics.

Personal logo javelin98 Supporting Member of TMP12 Nov 2014 11:19 p.m. PST

40µ would be good, 25µ would be even better. I think one of the guys I designed some stuff for got his masters made at 16µ!

However, for home use, 100µ isn't bad; it's about on par with the detail plastics from Shapeways.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.