"RFF greater losses rule question" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAmerican Civil War
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleThe G Dog replicates a mortar schooner at Fort Jackson during the New Orleans campaign.
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor heads for Vicksburg...
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Stew art | 30 Oct 2014 11:27 a.m. PST |
i've got a game of RFF coming up, first one in years… anyway, I'm gonna host, and i've always been confused about "greater losses," maybe becuse i've seen it played several ways, so which way do you do it? Greater losses is only applied after each side has reached heavy losses? or as written, where when one side reaches heavy losses if they also have greater losses then greater losses is applied instead of heavy losses. lots of losses in that sentence. thanks for the feedback! |
pzivh43 | 30 Oct 2014 12:16 p.m. PST |
Your second way is the way the designer makes us play it! He does lurk on TMP and so may chime in officially, if for no other reason to address his liking for the word losses… |
Stew art | 30 Oct 2014 4:34 p.m. PST |
well i guess I'll go as written then! no big, it;s jsut that i;ve seen it go both ways. (losses) : ) |
|