Help support TMP


"Did Nicholas II Really Abdicate?" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Early 20th Century Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

15mm WWI British Machinegun Platoon

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds a machinegun platoon to his WWI Brits.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Whence the Deep Ones?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian speculates about post-Innsmouth gaming.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,045 hits since 23 Oct 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0123 Oct 2014 9:54 p.m. PST

"On March 16th, 2012, I reported on my blog about a Conference on Tsar's Abdication Held in Moscow. I noted that there is a theory among a growing number of historians in Russia who claim that the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II was actually fabricated and that the manifesto document itself was forged by his enemies, anxious to see an end to his reign and the monarchy in Russia. The debate on this theory has actually been garnering headlines in the Russian media over the past year, including the following article. – Paul Gilbert
When the events of February-March of 1917 are discussed, almost everything is called into question and debated. Was the labor lockout at Putilovo Iron Works just a stupid move on the part of the management or a provocation? Was there any conspiracy among the generals, or the latter were not smart enough to assess the situation? Was MP Shulgin really a monarchist if he tried to persuade the monarch to abdicate? Was there food in Petrograd or was the capital city really threatened with famine? Did opposition to the royal family make a difference, or did nobody really care?

Questions seem to never end – even the exact date of the February bourgeois revolution in Russia is disputed. On March 12, spontaneous popular uprisings evolved into a political riot and led to the formation of the State Duma's interim committee. In the evening of the same day the Soviet of Workers' Deputies claimed power and on March 14 the Provisional Government set to work, so what is the reference date?…"
Full text here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Schogun24 Oct 2014 4:30 a.m. PST

Anyone subscribe to this website? Okay? Info looks very interesting.

Tango0124 Oct 2014 10:52 a.m. PST

Glad you like it my friend.

Amicalement
Armand

tuscaloosa31 Oct 2014 10:17 a.m. PST

Sounds like some scurrilous attempt to rewrite history, so not only can Putin extend for a fifth term, but he can be revealed to be the true Heir of Nicholas!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.