Help support TMP


"Throw me a 6 battle report" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Blogs of War Message Board

Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Game Design Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Heroscape: Road to the Forgotten Forest

It's a terrain expansion for Heroscape, but will non-Heroscape gamers be attracted by the trees?


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,078 hits since 15 Oct 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Who asked this joker15 Oct 2014 7:21 p.m. PST

You can find it here. link

The game played pretty well. I have most of the rules written but need to add a couple of items.

One question…should skirmishing types be allowed to charge the flank of an enemy if they are engaged with another unit?

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut15 Oct 2014 7:49 p.m. PST

Is there historical accounts of skirmishers breaking from harassing one unit to attack another? It makes sense from the God's Eye View we have as players, but would they be able to coordinate such a breakoff and reorganization in real time?

My preference is to make it so, but I am biased towards skirmish-intensive armies.

Who asked this joker15 Oct 2014 7:55 p.m. PST

I definitely don't think they should be able to break off and fight another unit in a single turn but breaking off from heavy infantry is definitely in the game. Cavalry can break off from any infantry.

You have a point though. It's a game so why not allow them to nip at the heels.

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut15 Oct 2014 8:45 p.m. PST

That becomes its own issue, however. If it is allowed just because it is a game, that opens the floodgates. But, if they can break away from a heavy infantry unit, there is no reason they cannot engage a different unit at a later time. I was envisioning breaking off from one and engaging another in the same move.

Sobieski15 Oct 2014 8:56 p.m. PST

Your question is ambiguous. Do you mean skirmishers who are engaged with another unit but discontinue their harassment to attack another (I'd say they wouldn't do that), or skirmishers who may not normally seek contact at close quarters but have an opportunity for a safe flank attack against an already engaged enemy whom they could disorder and render vulnerable to the frontal attack (which is what some types are skirmishers exist for)?

Kmfisher15 Oct 2014 10:53 p.m. PST

I gotta say I'm really looking forward to getting this on the table.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.