Help support TMP


"Rate Star Wars fighter-craft" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Star Wars Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article


1,045 hits since 4 Oct 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
sillypoint04 Oct 2014 8:57 p.m. PST

As a general statement and 1=not so good, 10= best, I'd appreciate your input in ranking, the x-wing, the y wing, the tie fighter and the imperial interceptor.
Thanks.

Personal logo Inari7 Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2014 10:36 p.m. PST

In the movies or for x-wing miniatures game?

sillypoint04 Oct 2014 10:48 p.m. PST

Speed, manoeuvrability, toughness…it's a subjective thing. ;) I could google-fu it, but I thought I'd pick the hive mind, that is TMP.

Katzbalger05 Oct 2014 7:16 a.m. PST

Well, based upon the first movie (Ep 4), it is clearly X-wing 8, Y-wing 5, TIE 4 (there were no TIE Interceptors in that one). Why rate that way? A small (and I mean very small) group of the first two types swatted away a (seemingly) much larger group of the latter, even though the TIEs had fire support from a large base (Death Star).

I suspect that the TIE's eggshell-like toughness plays into that as much as the script…

Rob

Personal logo Parzival Supporting Member of TMP05 Oct 2014 6:12 p.m. PST

Best all-around: X-wing

Otherwise they're purpose-designed craft, so really impossible to compare outside of that.

The TIE is fast and highly maneuverable, but has weak, single purpose weapons and no effective defensive armament to speak of. Like a Japanese Zero without the bombs. Its purpose is as an attack craft against small or lightly defended targets, with the military advantage largely based on fielding significant numbers.

The TIE Interceptor is even faster and more maneuverable, and has more firepower, but suffers from similar defensive weakness. Again, it's an attack or intercept craft against light targets.

TIE Advanced (Vader's craft) is more versatile, equivalent to the X-wing, with a general role as a heavy fighter capable of prolonged combat against heavier targets and light space-to-surface missile runs.

TIE Bomber is what it says it is; a light bomber intended for significant targets, though not necessarily heavily defended ones. A Stuka comes to mind, perhaps?

As for the Rebels, the Y-Wing is roughly equivalent in intent to a Mosquito fighter-bomber. Not fast or particularly maneuverable, but well armed and with significant defensive protection, it's a flying tank, intended for heavy strikes against large, well defended targets, but not for dogfighting (though it can hold its own).

The A-wing has real zip, matched only in speed and maneuverability by the TIE Interceptor. Though its primary weapons are weaker, it can field guided missiles and has defensive capabilities that the various TIE models lack. An excellent dogfight craft, with a clear role as such, like a Spitfire.

The B-wing fits the category known as a "strike interceptor." Neither significantly fast or maneuverable, it nevertheless outclasses the Y-wing in these areas, and carries heavy weapons and defensive armament second to no other "fighter" vessel. Again, not intended for dogfights, the B-wing's role is primarily to attack heavily defended targets, including small capital ships (as a squadron, of course, not one-on-one). Think F-111.

Outside of the films there are other craft, but these are the core you seem to be thinking of.

sillypoint05 Oct 2014 7:17 p.m. PST

Thanks for your input.:)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.