Help support TMP


"LCS: U.S. Navy Complied with Regulations, but..." Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Action Log

27 Sep 2014 6:23 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from Modern Naval Discussion board
  • Crossposted to Ultramodern (2004-2014) board

Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Profile Article

ISIS in the Year 2066

What if you want to game something too controversial or distasteful to put on the tabletop?


Current Poll


973 hits since 27 Sep 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0127 Sep 2014 12:34 p.m. PST

… Quality Problems Persisted after Delivery.

"The U.S. Navy decisions to accept the first two littoral combat ships (LCS)—LCS 1 and LCS 2—in incomplete, deficient conditions complied with the Federal Acquisition Regulation's (FAR) acceptance provisions, largely due to the cost-reimbursement type contracts in place to construct these ships.

The Navy also met FAR requirements related to responsibility for and place of acceptance, among other provisions, by using an authorized Navy representative to accept each ship at its respective contractor's facility. Under the cost-reimbursement contracts, the LCS 1 and LCS 2 prime contractors were only required to give their best efforts to complete quality-related activities—along with the other work specified in the contracts—up to each contract's estimated cost. These efforts resulted in both ships not completing all required sea trials—tests that evaluate ships' overall quality and performance against contractual requirements—including acceptance and final contract trials.

Not completing these trials increased knowledge gaps related to ship performance and deficiencies. In addition, LCS 1 and LCS 2 did not meet the quality standards outlined in the Navy's ship acceptance policy, although the policy also contains several notable flexibilities to these standards. In particular, the policy recognizes situations where the Navy may defer work until after delivery and final acceptances and affords the Chief of Naval Operations the authority to waive certain quality standards outlined in the policy. The Navy relied extensively on these waivers to facilitate its trials and acceptance processes for LCS 1 and LCS 2…"

picture

picture

Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Striker28 Sep 2014 7:21 a.m. PST

Maybe we should just be buying our ships overseas.

Lion in the Stars28 Sep 2014 1:54 p.m. PST

Oh, we're doing that, too, Striker. Where do you think a lot of the new high speed vessels are coming from?

Looks like we need to make a "ship will be ready to pass all trials and the builder is financially responsible for making it so" clause into new contracts.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.