Help support TMP


"150 years ago, today: A prisoner exchange at Charleston" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fire & Fury


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Project Completion: 1:72 Scale ACW Union Army

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian feels it's important to celebrate progress in one's personal hobby life.


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


603 hits since 23 Sep 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0123 Sep 2014 11:24 a.m. PST

"There is an oft repeated over simplification in regard to prisoner handling during the later stages of the Civil War. I'm sure you've heard or read that the Federals, specifically Lieutenant-General U.S. Grant, ceased all prisoner exchanges (which thus, in some jaded eyes, lead directly to the horrors of Andersonville). However, it is not the case that no exchanges took place. As any student of the war will quickly realize, exchange activity continued through the war. Some limited exchanges, such as the "original fifty" at Charleston. In other cases, the exchanges were larger in scope, such as that between Generals Sherman and Hood after the fall of Atlanta.

However, a significant difference emerged through 1864 on this matter. More and more the discussion of exchanges, as well as prisoner handling in general, became an instrument of war into itself. Today, we might call this "Strategic Communication" while other generations would identify elements of propaganda. No matter how you label it, both sides used the prisoners as a token at play on the chess board. The status of prisoners, be that at Charleston, Andersonville, or Fort Delaware, was offered to the general public to solidify support while disparaging the other side (North or South).

Appearing somewhat anachronistic in that light, the military authorities continued to rely upon regulations and policies for prisoner handling. The discussion was tense, but practice had to comply with conventions. Such was the case on September 23, 1864. Earlier in the month, Confederates had released several Federal surgeons, medical personnel, and chaplains under the conventions of the time for non-combatants. Upon receiving the list of those to be exchanged, Major-General John Foster identified some of these men properly as combatants who's status was mistaken (by no part of deception on anyone's part). To demonstrate good faith, Foster suggested his Confederate counterpart, Major-General Samuel Jones, accept five privates as part of the exchange…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.