"Battle of Chaeronea on small board with own rules on blog" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile ArticleWargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.
Current Poll
|
Shaun Travers | 13 Sep 2014 3:08 a.m. PST |
It has been a year since I last did a ancient historical replay with my fast rules for playing on a 2'x2' board. It seemed a lot shorter. I did some playtests of a programmable opponent in April and since then my brain has been mulling over some ways to streamline the rules themselves. I got distracted by WW2 skirmish but over the last five weeks I have spent most of my free time streamlining the rules. I firstly created a one page QRS from memory on what I thought the rules were. I then checked the QRS against the rules and mostly aligned the rules to what I had written in the QRS. I reduced the core rules by about 7-10% and the old QRS was 2 pages in two columns and is now 1 page in 3 columns. I am a lot happier with e rules. They were starting to get bloated and I did not like it. While 95% of the game is the same, 5% has gone, making it slightly simpler – I reduced modifiers to and rules exceptions. If you want the details look here but only for diehards: link Back to Chaeronea. The first historical replay with the slightly modified rules went well with the Greek general being destroyed causing most of the Greek army to fade away: link Here is a shot of the Companions, with some support, on the Macedonian left flank.
Download the newer rules here: link |
Caliban | 13 Sep 2014 3:46 a.m. PST |
Welcome back Shaun – it's good to see another of these! |
Shaun Travers | 13 Sep 2014 4:39 a.m. PST |
Thanks Paul. Reading battle reports on various blogs such as yours has "forced" me to come back. I never really went away in my mind – I really did not realise until a few weeks ago it has been a year! |
Temporary like Achilles | 13 Sep 2014 7:59 a.m. PST |
Nice one Shaun – you can't go wrong with Xyston figs, either! |
War Panda | 13 Sep 2014 8:28 a.m. PST |
Great report and really nice minis Shaun! Looks like just an interesting period to game…hmmm ;) |
normsmith | 13 Sep 2014 10:12 a.m. PST |
Shaun, can't believe a year has passed, but maybe some advantages for you in coming back fresh to your rules. I like the way that the game is so action packed. The morale check after leader loss feels like a good change – also lovely figures. |
Shaun Travers | 13 Sep 2014 2:45 p.m. PST |
The figures are amazing. I bought them of Andy Bryant (some of you may remember him when he was living in the UK before seeing the light and moving to Oz). I could not resist. They are the best painted figures i have! |
Olivero | 14 Sep 2014 12:57 p.m. PST |
"Generals are not permanently attached to units…." in the details changes section should read "Generals are now permanently attached to units…" shouldn't it? [There is always someone who feels challenged) Your blog is one of my favourites… glad your are back! |
Shaun Travers | 14 Sep 2014 1:11 p.m. PST |
Well spotted. The 'not' should be a 'now'…"Generals are now permanently attached to units". I changed it, and also took the opportunity to say "permanently attached to a unit" instead. Ta. |
|