Help support TMP


"The battle of Granicus, 334 BC. " Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Undead Dinos III

The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


801 hits since 8 Sep 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0108 Sep 2014 1:01 p.m. PST

"When Alexander succeeded to the throne of Macedon after the murder of his father Philip, he inherited a kingdom which had just come to dominate the affairs of mainland Greece. The position of Alexander was instable at first, but he reinforced it with a successful expedition against Thracian tribes at the Donau. Subsequently he was recognized as the leader of the Corinthian League after he had ended a revolt in Hellas by taking Thebes of the map. Now the time had come to fulful Philips of a combined attack of Hellas and Macedon on the Persians to punish them for their violent deeds 150 years earlier.

Not much had changed in the Persian army. They still had massive numbers of cavalry and archers. One thing that they had learned of the Persian wars was that the Greek hoplite was absolutly superior to the Persian infantery. Luckily for them was the beginning of the fourth century the time of mercenaries, and many Greeks were willing to serve in a foreign army as long as they got their share of the booty. The experienced Greek phalanx combined with the motivated Persian cavalry made the Persian army not only a huge army, but also a fearsome army.

The Macedonian army also used lots of mercenaries. The biggest problem with mercenaries was their morale, and that they did not a shared goal besides money. An army that only consisted of citizens always had ideals, and because of these ideals was the morale often high. Alexander managed to keep his army together thanks to his leadership, but most of all because of his bravery…"
Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Who asked this joker09 Sep 2014 7:50 a.m. PST

There is a glaring error in the article: The writer calls Alexander's infantry "Hoplits." Should they not be called Phalangites or Pikemen?

Sobieski09 Sep 2014 5:26 p.m. PST

I thought ancient Greek citizen soldiers were called "Hobbites". After all, "You shall not pass" would be a pretty good slogan for one of their most famous battles.

Sobieski09 Sep 2014 5:33 p.m. PST

Very poorly written, I have to add.

Marcus Maximus23 Sep 2014 6:27 a.m. PST

The artwork has been pilfered from Warry…….the internet is a two edged sword – on the on hand great source of info on the other downright plagiarism all the way :(

Armand please do not provide anymore links to these hokey websites unless they have given full acknowledged copyright to the respective owners….it's not fair on those who originally created / written the work. Thank you.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.