Help support TMP


"Soldiers on the Lombard helmet plate of King Agilulfo, 7thC" Topic


5 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Media Message Board

Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Media Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Babylonian Spearmen from Castaway Arts

We look at spearmen from Castaway Arts' new Babylonian line.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,278 hits since 30 Aug 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Druzhina30 Aug 2014 5:36 a.m. PST
Lewisgunner30 Aug 2014 8:06 a.m. PST

Its an interesting piece and I see no reason that it could not be genuinely associated with Agiluf. . The king looks right and has the right sort of beard to be a Lombard king.
What is interesting is that the shields shown on the guards are rather smaller than what can be reconstructed from finds in Lombard graves. Maybe they are reduced to fit the scale of the brow guard or maybe some Lombards had smaller shields…which would be more convenient around the palace.

Secondly, Paul the Deacon describes the Lombards in the suxth century as wearing white bindings on their lower legs. These chaps have wide trousers with what could be broad bands of coloured embroidery around the hem. Maybe that fashion had passed by then .


.

TKindred Supporting Member of TMP30 Aug 2014 4:54 p.m. PST

I have to tell you, that rather than broad bands, it looks to me like they are wearing boots with their trousers tucked into the tops of them.

Lewisgunner31 Aug 2014 2:44 a.m. PST

Interesting suggestion, but the second figure in from the left pretty well disproves that as the trouser overhangs the boot.

GurKhan31 Aug 2014 6:27 a.m. PST

Paul the Deacon says (Ch.XXIV) that a Gepid: "began to provoke the Langobards with insults declaring (because they wore white bandages from their calves down) that they were like mares with white feet up to the legs, saying: "The mares that you take after have white fetlocks"."

Ch.XXII: "They shaved the neck, and left it bare up to the back of the head, having their hair hanging down on the face as far as the mouth and parting it on either side by a part in the forehead. Their garments were loose and mostly linen, such as the Anglo-Saxons are wont to wear, ornamented with broad borders woven in various colors. Their shoes, indeed, were open almost up to the tip of the great toe, and were held on by shoe latchets interlacing alternately. But later they began to wear trousers, over which they put leggins of shaggy woolen cloth when they rode. But they had taken that from a custom of the Romans."

According to the 1907 Foulke edition "The monk of Salerno says that king Adaloald (A. D. 616-626) was the first who wore trousers" – and he was Agilulf's successor, meaning that Agilulf's men should really have been in the pre-trouser leg-wrapping vogue.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.