"Two explosive reminders that the US and China are in..." Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase ArticleIf snowflakes resemble snowy bees, then who rules over the snowflakes?
Featured Workbench ArticleDoes anyone else have trouble with the color green on microscale vehicles?
Featured Profile Article
|
Tango01 | 28 Aug 2014 9:30 p.m. PST |
… a hypersonic arms race. "The test of a rocket-powered glider called the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW) failed when US Army engineers ordered it to self-destruct after its launch went wrong early on August 25. The explosion left debris scattered across the Kodiak Launch Complex in Alaska: The destruction of the AHW is the second setback this month for world powers developing weapons intended to traverse the globe in the time of a reasonable daily commute. On August 7, a People's Liberation Army test of a hypersonic glider (known to the US military as WU-14) failed when it broke apart shortly after launch, according to the South China Morning Post. This US AHW is part of the Department of Defense's Conventional Prompt Global Strike plan, which would equip the US with the ability to hit any target on earth in as little as an hour. The AHW can travel at up to 10 times the speed of sound; in its first test in 2011, it flew 2,300 miles in less than half an hour from a launch site in Hawaii to a target in the Marshall Islands…" Full article here link Amicalement Armand |
Milites | 29 Aug 2014 2:34 a.m. PST |
Given the Chinese plane is probably as a result of hacking US designs, if that plane has a flaw it will naturally have been replicated in the Chinese design. |
David Manley | 29 Aug 2014 3:38 a.m. PST |
Actually it probably isn't. There may be some "input" but then again it would probably be true to say that Western projects probably benefit from similar "input" from elsewhere. From what I've seen of Chinese scientific research and development its rather better than some readers here would think. |
|