Karnophage | 22 Aug 2014 2:01 p.m. PST |
|
legatushedlius | 22 Aug 2014 3:48 p.m. PST |
A beautiful job on what I think are rather poor figures. |
Cardinal Hawkwood | 22 Aug 2014 7:25 p.m. PST |
I like the figures very much my humble efforts ,with some ring ins
|
Ivan DBA | 22 Aug 2014 11:26 p.m. PST |
Gripping Beast plastics are awesome. |
tigrifsgt | 23 Aug 2014 6:16 a.m. PST |
I love the GB figures. I have bought the Vikings, Saxons, and Dark Age boxes. That makes my Anglo-Dane army well over 100 figures, and I have never found anything wrong with them. TIG |
Cardinal Hawkwood | 23 Aug 2014 6:06 p.m. PST |
neither have I. and I like the Waragems Factory as well, currently kitbashing 1014 Irish |
Stew art | 28 Aug 2014 10:12 p.m. PST |
these were done for me, and they look better in person than in the photo. |
45thdiv | 29 Aug 2014 5:13 a.m. PST |
Thanks for sharing the pictures. And they are in the US and not overseas. |
Littlearmies | 31 Aug 2014 5:08 p.m. PST |
I'm with you Legatus – I have the Vikings, Dark Age infantry and Arab plastics and while they are all okay, none of them can compare to the Perry WotR figures for, well pretty much anything. The GB figures are much more limited in the way you can use arms for instance. And GB have made no attempt to add metal head options so you can adapt their figures for specific armies. They're okay but not in the same league as the Perries medieval plastics in my opinion. Karnophage – you've done a very nice job with them! |
HANS GRUBER | 01 Sep 2014 8:15 a.m. PST |
The Viking and Saxon packs are generally regarded as better than the dark ages release of the unarmored warriors. This is unfortunate because if done right the unarmored warriors have almost unlimited potential use. Rather than increasing the options in this pack they reduced them. |
Cardinal Hawkwood | 17 Sep 2014 3:35 p.m. PST |
some of you blokes don't seem to try hard enough. |