Help support TMP


""Warr Without an Enemie" -- Anyone tried these rules ???" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the English Civil War Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Battle-Market: Tannenberg 1410

The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Featured Book Review


1,444 hits since 21 Aug 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Jeff of SaxeBearstein21 Aug 2014 11:17 a.m. PST

Title says it; please comment on your thoughts about this rule set . . . please advise on likes/dislikes about them.


-- Jeff

JonFreitag21 Aug 2014 12:40 p.m. PST

Tried it? Never even heard of it!

Jeff of SaxeBearstein21 Aug 2014 12:53 p.m. PST

Here is a link to their site (I think that they are quite new):

wfgamers.org.uk/WWAE.htm


-- Jeff

boy wundyr x21 Aug 2014 2:56 p.m. PST

I have them but haven't played them (that's a project a few years/decades off). I picked them up after some buzz over the Miniatures Wargames review (quoted on their site). From my quick read-through they seemed interesting.

Jeff of SaxeBearstein21 Aug 2014 3:02 p.m. PST

What about them appealed to you, boy wundyr x? And was there anything that you didn't like?


-- Jeff

davbenbak21 Aug 2014 5:07 p.m. PST

I haven't played them but I think they have a very interesting and novel way of representing combat between mixed (shot & pike) units. Units are rated on a sliding scale of 1 to 7 based on their shot to pike ratio. As I recall you have to roll higher on a D6 than your rating for a hit from shooting and an all pike would have a 7 rating so therefor would be unable to score any shooting hits. But you score melee hits by rolling your score or lower so they are almost, there are some modifiers, guarantied at least one hit.

I think the emphasis is currently on ECW but they are working on a format that will work better with the entire TYW era. Definitely worth checking out their site.

John Watts23 Aug 2014 3:35 a.m. PST

I joined the yahoo group that was developing these rules, and played about a dozen games. The rules at that stage were a sort of amalgam of `Forlorn Hope' and `Loose Files and American Scramble'. Of course, I have no idea how the final published set turned out. My feelings while I was trying the game were that the addition of the LFAS bits did not add much to the experience, but that the changes to the FH parts were an improvement.

DOUGKL24 Aug 2014 7:21 p.m. PST

I was involved in some of the earlier play testing. Our group enjoyed the games. I know there were changes that led to the final product and I am not fully aware of them. We did like the command and control system. Generals have a varying number of points to spend each turn to have units take actions. As the battle evolves you often do not have enough points to do everything you want. So, you have to start making choices and victory usually goes to the side that gets the other guy behind the command points power curve. Overall we enjoyed the games and I was happy to provide some feedback.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.