"7th Edition 40K - New Space Wolves Codex Review - Troops " Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Warhammer 40K Message Board
Areas of InterestScience Fiction
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article A few basic techniques are enough to paint the Institute Scientist.
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Tango01 | 16 Aug 2014 11:40 a.m. PST |
"In the old days the Troops section was the real meat of the book. This was, of course, due to only Troops being scoring units (well mostly at least). If you're taking a Combined Arms detachment there's still some call for them to take advantage of Objective Secured but in a faction specific detachment they're less of a necessity. Indeed, if anything they feel like a tax you have to pay to be able to start taking some of the good stuff. This was never the case with the old SW book as you wanted to take plenty of Grey Hunters since they were frankly awesome. Let's see if that's still the case but there's the small matter of the Blood Claws first…" link Full review here
fromthefang.blogspot.com.ar Amicalement
Armand |
| Mithmee | 16 Aug 2014 8:59 p.m. PST |
Hmm, book cost over $55. USD Yup will not buy it. |
| basileus66 | 17 Aug 2014 4:07 a.m. PST |
I've been a W40K player for 18 years, but lately I have been losing interest in the game. I used to buy all codexes, even those for factions I didn't collect. It's not the price what it is driving me out from the game, though. It's… I don't know… the silliness of the concepts, I think. My son and I have been using Tomorrow's War for our W40K games, and truth be told, we are enjoying them more than those taken using GW's official rules. |
| Mithmee | 17 Aug 2014 7:26 a.m. PST |
That is because Tomorrow's War was written by individuals who know how to write a set a rules. While 40K is being written by idiots who have no clue on how to write anything. |
| Der Krieg Geist | 17 Aug 2014 9:53 a.m. PST |
What is with the DragonBall Z hairdos…never-mind, I should not even ask. This stuff has jumped so far over the top of the shark,flying dumpsters,four foot claws, 80s big hair…, I don't see any point in it anymore, at least not for myself. |
| kalgaloth | 17 Aug 2014 4:05 p.m. PST |
|
| Your Kidding | 18 Aug 2014 1:34 p.m. PST |
+1 Der Krieg. What's w the hairspray? The extra ornaments on the armor look good. I afraid to ask which organ GW wants for them So, 3rd edition anyone? |
| Caesar | 19 Aug 2014 6:02 a.m. PST |
I'm fairly certain that some of the the hair styles are meant to emulate Gallic warriors. |
| britty87 | 27 Sep 2014 7:17 a.m. PST |
der krieg geist..please contact me asap at brittelabarge@gmail very important..thanks |
| TheGaffer | 29 Sep 2014 9:17 a.m. PST |
Great thread and the link goes to a great review. |
|
