"Cruiser A9, A10, and A13 interior arrangements?" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestWorld War Two on the Land
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
emckinney | 24 Jul 2014 9:37 a.m. PST |
Does anyone have any information about the interior arrangement of the A9 and A10 cruisers (especially) or the A13? I haven't been able to find any photographs or illustrations at all. In particular, where was the ammunition stored? Was the turret bustle for ammunition or for the radio? |
donlowry | 24 Jul 2014 9:42 a.m. PST |
Just a guess, but I believe British practice was to put the radio in the turret bustle. That was the main difference between the M3 Lee and the M3 Grant. |
Martin Rapier | 24 Jul 2014 11:28 a.m. PST |
Neither my Bellona on the A13 nor David Fletchers otherwise exhaustive 'The Great Tank Scandal' go into the interior arrangements of the A13 in much detail, however the loader doubled up as radio operator, so the radio was in the turret, although whether it was beside or behind the loader is anyones guess. Ergonomics would suggest the turret rear unless the loader was very adept at spinning 180 degrees to alternate between feeding the gun and spinning dials. There would also be some ready use ammo in the turret. |
MAD MIKE | 24 Jul 2014 11:54 a.m. PST |
Here is a written description for the A13 link |
emckinney | 24 Jul 2014 1:37 p.m. PST |
The Covenanter was quite a different tank than the A13 Mk. I and II. The designation system was confusing, probably for political reasons. I suspect that some in the War Office, etc., wanted to avoid admitting that the A13 was yet another failed design and that they needed something different. Also, The design requirement called for using as many components from the original A13 as possible, which particularly showed up in the suspension. However, that's individual components, not the design. |
batesmotel34 | 25 Jul 2014 11:55 a.m. PST |
The Valentine was derived from the design of the A9/A10 so its turret interior is probably similar and may be easier to find. Chris |
|