Help support TMP


"Japan to build walking Gundam" Topic


16 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Media Message Board

Back to the SF Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Starmada


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Wyrd's Baby Kade: Something Wyrd

It's Thanksgiving - and I'm thankful I won this eBay auction!


Featured Workbench Article

Simple Basing Technique for Modern Pulp

One way to base Modern Pulp figures for a wide variety of environments.


Featured Book Review


1,084 hits since 9 Jul 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

15mm and 28mm Fanatik09 Jul 2014 12:24 p.m. PST

So cool. It would be even cooler if it has functioning weapon systems.

link

Patrick R09 Jul 2014 12:34 p.m. PST

My guess is that it will be a shuffling kind of walking motion using wheels, like this one.

YouTube link

Mr Canuck09 Jul 2014 12:38 p.m. PST

If anyone can do it, my money would be on the Japanese and their advancements in robotics.

It would be even cooler if it has functioning weapon systems.

…only a matter of time, if they get the first one working…

Cergorach09 Jul 2014 12:43 p.m. PST

Over 50 years some kid is wondering why every military has walking robots as their primary combat vehicle. His dad still blames the Japanese and their silly cartoon obsessions for that foobar! ;-)

DsGilbert09 Jul 2014 2:15 p.m. PST

My question is, why do people feel we need a walking platform? If anything we should be focusing on hovering type platforms.

Lion in the Stars09 Jul 2014 4:28 p.m. PST

Walking platforms make sense in urban and other dense terrain.

tracks make sense in the open desert/steppes. hover on the water, or transitioning between water and sandy beach.

Hover is very loud and requires a crapton of power. The USN LCAC has 16,000hp installed, and weighs 180 tons fully loaded. A 70-ton M1 Abrams has all of 1500 horsepower installed. 6x the horsepower per ton of a main battle tank.

rvandusen Supporting Member of TMP09 Jul 2014 5:54 p.m. PST

Now if only the Japanese can genetically engineer a super schoolgirl to pilot the gundam, they will be invincible.

Sargonarhes09 Jul 2014 5:59 p.m. PST

They're not going to go for just a shuffling walk, they got RC mobile suits that already do that.

YouTube link

But I got to feel sorry for this poor little Gundam being picked on by a Zaku bigger than it.
YouTube link

Coelacanth09 Jul 2014 7:49 p.m. PST

My question is, why do people feel we need a walking platform?

They're planning to cancel the Apocalypse? laugh

Ron

Khusrau10 Jul 2014 3:18 a.m. PST

walking is much more power efficient than hover or flying – carries a bigger payload, and less risk if things foul up mechanically – and much more versatile over bad terrain than tracks or wheels – BUT – a much better target than a fast flyer or a low profile vehicle.

Horses for Courses-

DsGilbert10 Jul 2014 5:37 a.m. PST

We make silent helicopters now. How is a giant walking machine that shakes the very ground a viable platform? I understand a power suit, but these things are ridiculous.

Lion in the Stars10 Jul 2014 12:08 p.m. PST

I agree that Gundams are ludicrously oversized for land combat.

Personally, I'd be surprised to see anything bigger than 5m tall in a ground-combat walker, with 3.5-4.5m being the most likely size range. 3.5m is a meter or so taller than an Abrams, and roughly 50cm taller than an M2 Bradley. If your ground-combat walker can go prone like an infantryman, it would be even shorter than an Abram's hull.

In space, however, a humanoid form may have some advantages in stretching delta-v. After all, a human shape can shift it's center of gravity relative to the center of thrust.

Stryderg10 Jul 2014 8:08 p.m. PST

But if they're over 30 feet tall, they can shoot OVER the trees.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse10 Jul 2014 10:09 p.m. PST

Any thing that big is just a target … Even though Sci-fi games often have them …

retzlaffmd11 Jul 2014 2:09 p.m. PST

Hover sucks as a motive system- too loud, and the wind pushes them around too much. Recoil for anything larger than a HMG will push them around as well. As for large humanoid walkers, I agree that for ground combat they're too tall/large to be practical… But the cool factor is too high to not have them, at least in sci-fi settings. Battletech fluff covered why they proliferated in that setting, sheer amount of weaponry/types of weapons with fewest crew needed/more armor protection per area of vehicle vs. larger cargo footprint/fewer weapons & types/more crew/fuel for IC engines on traditional tanks – though even then the need for traditional vehicles never went away.

Sargonarhes11 Jul 2014 5:04 p.m. PST

Well Retzlaffmd Gundam has often had it's own fluff of why mobile suits became the weapon of choice, as they primarily started as a space borne weapon. When the Zeon's landed on Earth they did make tanks and aircraft, but because more Zeon designers and engineers were born on the colonies they had little experience with actual aircraft. As a result Federation fighters tended to perform better, for the most part the Zeon's mobile suits often out performed any the Feddies had. Until the Gundam showed up.

UC Gundam has Minovsky particles which when in use jammed radar and interfered with many electronic signals, making all combat pretty much back to close quarters affair. The giant robots were just an extension of that idea, the Feddies even went back to using close range wire guided missiles.

Don't ask about the other Gundam universes, they just go ahead and assume the mobile suits are there and give no explanation for the why they are used.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.