Help support TMP


"88 battery security" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Rate of Fire


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Workbench Article

A Soviet T-28 in 28mm

Neil Burt of Troop of Shewe tackles the Soviet T-28 in 28mm scale from Force of Arms.


Featured Book Review


1,194 hits since 7 Jul 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 13 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Sundance07 Jul 2014 7:11 p.m. PST

The Germans had a couple of batteries of 88s (well, at least one) in the far north of Finland throughout the war. Since it was a fairly isolated outpost, did they have a security element (say a platoon of infantry or the like) or would the gunners have had to pull their own security? I know the battery was surrounded with barbed wire, but it doesn't appear that they mounted a regular guard duty on the perimeter. Wondering if anyone had any idea what the arrangements would have been or what typical security arrangements would have been.

tuscaloosa07 Jul 2014 7:33 p.m. PST

There is a possible parallel with the detached German Flak Korps that was stationed at Ploesti, to provide AA for the Romanian oilfields. That unit had Luftwaffe ground infantry elements for security, but I can't find any more specifics other than that they had PzII tanks, and single and quad 20mm AA on halftracks in '43 and '44. When they finally pulled out of Romania in late '44 when the Rumanians switched sides, they had to do a fighting withdrawal to Germany. Since the Rumanians had Ft-17 tanks in rear area security roles, there would be a great potential for obscure tank combat scenarios. Anyhow, I digress and my point is that there should probably be some kind of Luftwaffe field ground unit for security.

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP08 Jul 2014 4:49 a.m. PST

My guess is that they provided their own security element.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP08 Jul 2014 5:29 a.m. PST

The Luftwaffe had lots and lots of troops to provide ground security – so many that the Germans formed whole divisions of them; there were 1,700,000 people in the Luftwaffe in 1941, mostly in non-flying positions

The Luftwaffe provided most of its own security everywhere, including Alarmeinheiten to guard air-bases from partisans in Russia

Personal logo Jeff Ewing Supporting Member of TMP08 Jul 2014 7:54 a.m. PST

The Luftwaffe provided most of its own security everywhere
Aaaaand, let me hijack this thread to complain that no one makes infantry in fleigerbluse in 28mm/1:56.

Martin Rapier08 Jul 2014 7:59 a.m. PST

Here is the KStN for an 88mm battery,

link

it has an overall strength of almost 170 men and includes 150 rifles, a dozen SMGs and four LMGs.

I don't really think they needed additional elements to provide battery security.

Sundance08 Jul 2014 2:10 p.m. PST

Most excellent – thanks, Martin!

Martin Rapier08 Jul 2014 11:10 p.m. PST

No problem, it is very easy to forget what large units artillery batteries are as we tend to just count gun tubes.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.