"Second Battle of Guadalcanal using Naval Thunder" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the WWII Battle Reports Message Board Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board Back to the Blogs of War Message Board
Action Log
09 Jul 2014 6:40 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "Second Battle of Guadalcanal Canal using Naval Thunder" to "Second Battle of Guadalcanal using Naval Thunder"
Areas of InterestGeneral
World War Two on the Land
World War Two at Sea
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article Thinking to invade German-held Europe? Then you'll need some of these...
Featured Workbench Article Mal Wright  experiments to find a better way to mount aircraft for wargaming.
Featured Profile Article
|
| scrivs | 07 Jul 2014 1:37 p.m. PST |
Mog and I played the Second Battle of Guadalcanal scenario using Naval Thunder on Tuesday evening.
More pictures and commentary on the Scrivsland blog link |
| LtJBSz | 07 Jul 2014 3:01 p.m. PST |
All of the Japanese torpedo tubes had reloads, the U.S, battleships should have had to face another salvo of long lances. |
Shagnasty  | 07 Jul 2014 6:28 p.m. PST |
It was difficult and dangerous to reload in close combat. The DDs could pull back,reload then return to combat. Remember the LL was two tons of Oxygen and high explosive. |
| Phil Hall | 08 Jul 2014 1:50 p.m. PST |
Did you use the over-penetration rule? It makes a huge difference in DD survivability. |
| scrivs | 09 Jul 2014 4:40 a.m. PST |
Thanks chaps. We did use the over-penetration rule, but a 16" shell going through a DD still makes a mess and causes a critical. |
|
