Help support TMP


"U.S. Military Turns To Hollywood To Outfit The Soldier..." Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fire Fight


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

C-in-C's 1:285 Soviet BMP3

Time to upgrade your BMP1s and 2s?


Featured Workbench Article

C-in-C's 1:285 T-72s & BTR-70s

Beowulf Fezian has been itching for a small Soviet project!


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Current Poll


736 hits since 6 Jul 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0106 Jul 2014 10:06 p.m. PST

…Of The Future.

"The Oscar-nominated designers at Legacy Effects have outfitted such memorable movie warriors as The Terminator, RoboCop, Captain America and Iron Man.

The special-effects company is now at work on what seems a mission impossible: Building an Iron Man-style suit to protect and propel elite U.S. troops by encasing them in body armor equipped with an agile exoskeleton to enable troops to carry hundreds of pounds of gear.

The 3-D printers that once churned out parts for actor Robert Downey Jr.'s red and gold movie armor are making pieces for a Pentagon prototype. Military officials recently examined three designs, an early step in a project by the U.S. Special Operations Command to create a new generation of protective armor within the next four years…"

Full article here
link

Amicalement
Armand

Tango0106 Jul 2014 10:08 p.m. PST

Forget these.

picture

Amicalement
Armand

EJNashIII07 Jul 2014 8:44 p.m. PST

It will suffer from the same basic problem Iron-man had to solve, a compact power source. Where is the Arc reactor?

PMC31718 Jul 2014 2:51 p.m. PST

The first step is probably using heavily armoured powered exo-skeleton suits with rechargeable battery packs in storming buildings or similar CQB. Police and SF units taking delivery.

Solve the power issue – and there's a LOT of people working on it – and the armoured exoskeleton becomes a lot more practical.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse18 Jul 2014 2:54 p.m. PST

I like to see it come into reality …

Lion in the Stars19 Jul 2014 12:16 p.m. PST

One old DARPA project was to make a microturbine generator for the lightly-armored Future Soldier program (ie, the US Army Power Ranger). Only makes ~20watts or so, but will run 8 hours on ~20oz of jet fuel. It's also about the size of an M16 magazine pouch, including both fuel and batteries/capacitors.

My LG Ally cellphone draws about 5 watts while sending/receiving, and has all the capabilities the comms system for a power armor suit would need. Which leaves the rest of the power supplied by the generator to charge the supercapacitors.

The hell with batteries, humans shift from burning 125 watts walking around to over 2500 watts in an Olympic-level sprint. Assuming that your armor and gear masses about as much as a human does (~90kg), the armor needs to generate 125 watts constantly and 2500 watts at full combat emergency power. So you'd need more or bigger microturbine generators, but they'd work.

tuscaloosa19 Jul 2014 1:20 p.m. PST

I think the answer is to put the power generator in any of these robot "mule" systems, and allow for the trooper to periodically recharge from the mule.

Which means your typical infantry stand of the near future would be 5-6 soldiers in a loose formation around a robot mule.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse19 Jul 2014 3:45 p.m. PST

That may be one solution … but I'm personally not that happy with it … don't like being wedded to a vehicle. Even a 4 legged 'bot …

Steve Wilcox19 Jul 2014 4:39 p.m. PST
Lion in the Stars19 Jul 2014 5:21 p.m. PST

For extremely short-term ops like a SWAT raid or the Bin Laden op, you might be OK with having most of your power supply not on the armor.

Mogadishu is a perfect example of why that would be a really BAD idea.

badger2219 Jul 2014 9:24 p.m. PST

Shoot one mule, down goes the squad. Armys really dont like things like that.

owen

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.