Help support TMP


"Which war should I do?" Topic


25 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Book Review


1,264 hits since 27 Jun 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

138SquadronRAF27 Jun 2014 12:23 p.m. PST

I'm currently considering doing one of two 19thC wars. Trouble is I don't have time to do both.

Which should I choose and why?

Franc-Prussian(1870-1)
Russo-Turkish (1877-8)

Thoughts gentlemen?

Texas Jack27 Jun 2014 12:28 p.m. PST

My vote would go to Russo-Turkish because it is a bit off the beaten track. Of course, that may also be a disadvantage when it comes time to buy figures.

nnascati Supporting Member of TMP27 Jun 2014 12:29 p.m. PST

Given the choice of those two, I'd lean towards the Russo-Turkish War. Primarily because you can get double use out of both armies. The Russians fought constantly with tribes in the Cacasus Mountains throughout the later 19th century. The Turks can be used against Arab slavers, rebellious Egyptians etc. Plus plenty of what ifs against French or British colonial forces.

Personal logo Saber6 Supporting Member of TMP Fezian27 Jun 2014 12:45 p.m. PST

Franco Prussian. You can use the French for 1914 battles too

Broglie27 Jun 2014 12:50 p.m. PST

Franco Prussian War.

There are so many more books and rules sets available as well as a better range of figures in all scales.

Also you can also use your French for Crimea 1854 and Italy 1859 and you can use the Prussians for 1866.

Just my opinion.

Happy Little Trees27 Jun 2014 12:56 p.m. PST

Russo-Turk. It's different.

Plus you get to use Bashi-bazouks.

How fun is that to say. C'mon, say it out loud. See?

Kind of an easy decision now, isn't it?

nickinsomerset27 Jun 2014 1:22 p.m. PST

As per Broglie,

Tally Ho!

Personal logo Unlucky General Supporting Member of TMP27 Jun 2014 2:49 p.m. PST

I suggest it may depend on your figure scale. I have leapt toward FPW but in 15mm (first time ever) because of the figure availability issues and the size of battle I want to fight. I'd suggest that the FPW is still a marginalized conflict in the English speaking wargaming world. I don't know anyone personally who's into it.

Personal logo 20thmaine Supporting Member of TMP27 Jun 2014 5:22 p.m. PST

It's this

picture

or that

picture

Not an easy decision.

45thdiv27 Jun 2014 7:08 p.m. PST

I think the editor would co with the fez. :-)

What do think would be more interesting to paint? You like both but if you can only pick one, pick one that you will get the most enjoyment out of.

Lion in the Stars27 Jun 2014 7:44 p.m. PST

I think the Russo-Turkish War would have more interesting uniforms.

I know the NWF is pretty plain. Mostly white(ish) or khaki cloth.

brunet28 Jun 2014 2:35 a.m. PST

it's more red fez against red trousers?

Cerdic28 Jun 2014 7:54 a.m. PST

Fez's are cool….

Porthos28 Jun 2014 12:32 p.m. PST

It would ( at least for me ) depend on the chosen scale. My Prussian Army is 10mm because of the size of the battlefields ( the earlier war against the Austrians saw the battle of Königgratz and I visited the battlefield ( now Karlovy Vary in Chech Republic ) was gigantic.
I have Eureka Russians for the war against the Turks ( summer uniform ) and meant them to be used in the Great Game ( a what if, of course ) . Later on Askari too made fine looking figures.
Also read "Sabres of Paradise" , by Leslie Blanch
( link ) for the struggle in the Caucasus. Not only magnificent reading but also chockful of possible scenarios. And, last but not least, als the Ottomans of the period did more than fighting just the Russians… ( ;- ) ) .

45thdiv28 Jun 2014 5:14 p.m. PST

Miss that Dr. Bow ties are cool too. :-). I had forgotten about the red fez.

Ragbones28 Jun 2014 6:23 p.m. PST

Russo-Turkish War. There's a nice variety of different troops (Bulgarian Legion', Bashi Bazouks, etc), interesting uniforms, and everything from the great Siege of Plevna to open field actions to small scale actions in mountain passes. The FPW is an interesting war to game but for me the RTW had that little extra oomph I was looking for. But to each their own. I used Rank and File 15mm miniatures and like them a lot. There are more alternatives available now then when I put together my collection. I *think* Lancashire may have a line of 15mm RTW minis.

KTravlos28 Jun 2014 8:49 p.m. PST

If you want to use cavalry in charges FPW (failed as they will be). If not RTW.

Gaz004529 Jun 2014 3:38 a.m. PST

The Osprey on the Russo-Turkish War has some very nice pics of the uniforms……..it has spurred me into that direction…..I'm re-purposing figures from ACW,Crimean and Napoleonic ranges for 'fun' in 1/72……!

Martin Rapier29 Jun 2014 6:03 a.m. PST

FPW because before you know it you'll find yourself using the Prussians for the APW and the French for 1859. Three wars in one, what could be better value:)

RTW is a bit niche for me.

KTravlos29 Jun 2014 7:06 a.m. PST

There is a good Strelets 1/72 range for RTW. It is not complete but has the main arms of the two armies

Duc de Limbourg29 Jun 2014 1:14 p.m. PST

FPW,
readily abailable information, figures (in various scales)and rules
figures usable for other wars/theates
open battles, skismishes, sieges, irrgular warfare (esp in the later period), irregular forces (also in the later period)
altogether much more colorfull than RTW

Intrepide29 Jun 2014 5:39 p.m. PST

I was looking at Russo-Turkish not long ago. Very tempting. Striking uniforms and terrain, although my impression was that it is basically a handful of decisive siege and storming operations and some hellish fights in forsaken rock patches. Pendraken does fair sized ranges in 10mm.

I would have to go RTW. The nations, the uniforms and the terrain are more exotic, and each of them can punch the other pretty hard.

Lascaris29 Jun 2014 9:17 p.m. PST

FPW. I think there are more "what-if's" in that war that make it very interesting. There's also a lot of decent books on the fpw.

Old Contemptibles30 Jun 2014 12:08 p.m. PST

Defiantly FPW. We use TDFG. Lots of scenarios for such a short war. Great uniforms to paint. The OG 15mm FPW line is one of their best.

Clays Russians30 Jun 2014 12:11 p.m. PST

Damn the choice, do Crimean war, Lots of French,Russians, British and Turks. And believe it or not, almost all the French were still using smoothbore muskets as well as 90% of the Russians. Even the British forth division had smoothbores the first year of the campaign

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.