Help support TMP


"The five greatest metal battleships of all time" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Constructing the Japanese Patrol Aeronef Moni

dampfpanzerwagon Fezian scratchbuilds another Victorian flying machine.


Featured Profile Article

15mm Battlefield in a Box: Bridges

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finds bridges to match the river sets.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,511 hits since 25 Jun 2014
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0125 Jun 2014 12:44 p.m. PST

"In December last year, The National Interest listed the world's five greatest battleships, defined as the most iconic. Definitions matter. Less adventurous but more easily defended, here's a list of the five greatest metal battleships, defined as having the most influential designs. A list of the five that were greatest in service would be different again…"
Full article here
link

Hope you enjoy!.

Amicalement
Armand

Texas Jack25 Jun 2014 2:53 p.m. PST

This article was interesting, but kind of stupid. First, if influence is his measure, then why say "greatest"? How about most influential? Of course, even then his choices would still be awful for the most part.

For example, how could he pick Gloire over Warrior? Gloire may have been built first, but she was essentially a wooden ship sheathed in iron plates, whereas Warrior was all iron construction, which certainly pointed more to the future than Gloire.

I agree with the choice of the Royal Sovereigns and Dreadnought.

And finally, how on earth can he put battlecruisers on a list about battleships?

wminsing25 Jun 2014 5:25 p.m. PST

I agree with Texas Jack; Warrior set the standard for future ship design in ways that the Glorie did not. And I definitely do NOT agree with the Hood being included, it's design didn't really influence the post-Washington Treaty ships in any meaningful way.

-Will

Personal logo Murphy Sponsoring Member of TMP25 Jun 2014 5:38 p.m. PST

Plus the fact that he didn't have the testicles to mention The USS Texas…..

Charlie 1225 Jun 2014 6:58 p.m. PST

Yet another stupid 'Top (fill in the number) (thing) of All Time' list. And this one is as bad as any of them….

Texas Jack26 Jun 2014 4:46 a.m. PST

Damn straight Murphy!

Old Slow Trot26 Jun 2014 6:50 a.m. PST

Or the USS Iowa class BB's,when retrofitted for updated weapons,commo,etc..

wminsing27 Jun 2014 8:47 a.m. PST

Or the USS Iowa class BB's,when retrofitted for updated weapons,commo,etc..

Great warships, but not 'influential' on later designs since they were among the last battleships commissioned….

-Will

BigNickR28 Jun 2014 7:44 a.m. PST

if anything they were the most INFLUENCED

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.